Literature DB >> 25863670

The progression of corrected myopia.

Antonio Medina1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study seeks to demonstrate the existence of a feedback loop controlling myopia by comparing the prediction of a feedback model to the actual progression of corrected myopia. In addition to theoretical results, confirming clinical data are presented.
METHODS: The refraction of 13 continuously corrected myopic eyes was collected over a period of time ranging from 4 to 9 years from the time of their first correction. Refractive data was collected in an optometry office from myopic young subjects from the general population in Boston. Subjects were myopes, ages 2 to 22 at the time of first correction selected randomly from a larger population. All individuals were fully corrected with lenses; new lenses were prescribed every time that their myopia increased by 0.25 diopters or more. Subjects wore their spectacle lenses during the followed period.
RESULTS: Subjects exhibit a linear time course of myopia progression when corrected with lenses. The observed rate of myopia increase is 0.2 to 1.0 diopters/year, with a mean correlation coefficient r  = -0.971, p < 0.005.
CONCLUSIONS: This report establishes that feedback control theory applies to the clinical phenomenon of progressive myopia. Continuous correction of myopia results in a linear progression that increases myopia. The Laplace transformation of temporal refractive data to the s-domain simplifies the study of myopia and emmetropia. The feedback transfer function predicts that continuous correction of myopia results in a linear progression because continuous correction opens the feedback loop. This prediction is confirmed with all subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25863670     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-2991-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  22 in total

1.  Progression of myopia in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren is slowed by wearing progressive lenses.

Authors:  J T Leung; B Brown
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Bifocal control of myopia.

Authors:  K H Oakley; F A Young
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1975-11

3.  A model for emmetropization. The effect of corrective lenses.

Authors:  A Medina
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1987-10

4.  Emmetropization as a first-order feedback system.

Authors:  A Medina; E Fariza
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Statistical analysis of multi-eye data in ophthalmic research.

Authors:  W A Ray; D M O'Day
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  The progression of myopia from its onset at age 8-12 to adulthood and the influence of heredity and external factors on myopic progression. A 23-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Olavi Pärssinen; Markku Kauppinen; Anne Viljanen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Myopia stabilization and associated factors among participants in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Effects of spectacle intervention on the progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  E Ong; K Grice; R Held; F Thorn; J Gwiazda
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Linearity of refractive change with age in childhood myopia progression.

Authors:  D A Goss
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-10

10.  Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression.

Authors:  Kahmeng Chung; Norhani Mohidin; Daniel J O'Leary
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  16 in total

1.  Refractive correction and myopia progression.

Authors:  Virgilio Galvis; Alejandro Tello; Oscar Blanco; M Margarita Parra
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Detecting the effect of under-correcting myopia.

Authors:  Antonio Medina
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Progressive Myopia and Lid Suture Myopia are Explained by the Same Feedback Process: a Mathematical Model of Myopia.

Authors:  Antonio Medina; Peter R Greene
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2015-06

4.  Refraction data survey: 2nd generation correlation of myopia.

Authors:  Peter R Greene; Antonio Medina
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Plastic modification of the cornea by pneumatic force corrects myopia: Pneumatic keratology.

Authors:  A Medina
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Effect of uncorrection versus full correction on myopia progression in 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Yun-Yun Sun; Shi-Ming Li; Si-Yuan Li; Meng-Tian Kang; Luo-Ru Liu; Bo Meng; Feng-Ju Zhang; Michel Millodot; Ningli Wang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Prevention of myopia by partial correction of hyperopia: a twins study.

Authors:  Antonio Medina
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  Advanced myopia, prevalence and incidence analysis.

Authors:  Peter R Greene; Judith M Greene
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Growth curves of myopia-related parameters to clinically monitor the refractive development in Chinese schoolchildren.

Authors:  Pablo Sanz Diez; Li-Hua Yang; Mei-Xia Lu; Siegfried Wahl; Arne Ohlendorf
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Juvenile Myopia. Predicting the Progression Rate.

Authors:  Peter R Greene; Antonio Medina
Journal:  Mathews J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.