Literature DB >> 24159085

Myopia stabilization and associated factors among participants in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use the Gompertz function to estimate the age and the amount of myopia at stabilization and to evaluate associated factors in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET) cohort, a large ethnically diverse group of myopic children.
METHODS: The COMET enrolled 469 ethnically diverse children aged 6 to younger than 12 years with spherical equivalent refraction between -1.25 and -4.50 diopters (D). Noncycloplegic refraction was measured semiannually for 4 years and annually thereafter. Right eye data were fit to individual Gompertz functions in participants with at least 6 years of follow-up and at least seven refraction measurements over 11 years. Function parameters were estimated using a nonlinear least squares procedure. Associated factors were evaluated using linear regression.
RESULTS: In total, 426 participants (91%) had valid Gompertz curve fits. The mean (SD) age at myopia stabilization was 15.61 (4.17) years, and the mean (SD) amount of myopia at stabilization was -4.87 (2.01) D. Ethnicity (P < 0.0001) but not sex or the number of myopic parents was associated with the age at stabilization. Ethnicity (P = 0.02) and the number of myopic parents (P = 0.01) but not sex were associated with myopia magnitude at stabilization. At stabilization, African Americans were youngest (mean age, 13.82 years) and had the least myopia (mean, -4.36 D). Participants with two versus no myopic parents had approximately 1.00 D more myopia at stabilization. The age and the amount of myopia at stabilization were correlated (r = -0.60, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The Gompertz function provides estimates of the age and the amount of myopia at stabilization in an ethnically diverse cohort. These findings should provide guidance on the time course of myopia and on decisions regarding the type and timing of interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gompertz function; associated factors; myopia; myopia progression; myopia stabilization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24159085      PMCID: PMC3850666          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  39 in total

Review 1.  To emmetropize or not to emmetropize? The question for hyperopic development.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Relationship of age, sex, and ethnicity with myopia progression and axial elongation in the correction of myopia evaluation trial.

Authors:  Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda; Mohamed Hussein; Thomas T Norton; Ying Wang; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Donald Everett
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07

3.  Variables related to the rate of childhood myopia progression.

Authors:  D A Goss
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 4.  Myopia.

Authors:  Ian G Morgan; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Myopia and associated pathological complications.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Gus Gazzard; Edwin Chan Shih-Yen; Wei-Han Chua
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The relationship between growth spurts and myopia in Singapore children.

Authors:  Vivien Cherng-Hui Yip; Chen-Wei Pan; Xiao-Yu Lin; Yung-Seng Lee; Gus Gazzard; Tien-Yin Wong; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Role of near work in myopia: findings in a sample of Australian school children.

Authors:  Jenny M Ip; Seang-Mei Saw; Kathryn A Rose; Ian G Morgan; Annette Kifley; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Progression of myopia in youth: age of cessation.

Authors:  D A Goss; R L Winkler
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1983-08

9.  Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children.

Authors:  Jane E Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Thomas T Norton; Mohamed E M Hussein; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Ruth Manny; Ying Wang; Donald Everett
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Myopia progression in young school children and intraocular pressure.

Authors:  H Jensen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  35 in total

1.  Progressive Myopia and Lid Suture Myopia are Explained by the Same Feedback Process: a Mathematical Model of Myopia.

Authors:  Antonio Medina; Peter R Greene
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2015-06

2.  Axial Elongation in Myopic Children and its Association With Myopia Progression in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial.

Authors:  Wei Hou; Thomas T Norton; Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.018

3.  Preventing Myopia.

Authors:  Wolf A Lagrèze; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  The progression of corrected myopia.

Authors:  Antonio Medina
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Longitudinal Changes in Lens Thickness in Myopic Children Enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

Authors:  Jane Gwiazda; Thomas T Norton; Wei Hou; Leslie Hyman; Ruth Manny
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  Juvenile Myopia. Predicting the Progression Rate.

Authors:  Peter R Greene; Antonio Medina
Journal:  Mathews J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-13

Review 7.  [Current recommendations for deceleration of myopia progression].

Authors:  W A Lagrèze; L Joachimsen; F Schaeffel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Internal Astigmatism in Myopes and Non-myopes: Compensation or Constant?

Authors:  Ruth E Manny; Li Deng; Jane Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Erik Weissberg; Mitchell Scheiman; Karen D Fern
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  [Analysis of spectacle lens prescriptions shows no increase of myopia in Germany from 2000 to 2015].

Authors:  W Wesemann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Mathematical Models of College Myopia.

Authors:  Peter R Greene; Zachary W Grill; Antonio Medina
Journal:  Optik (Stuttg)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.