Literature DB >> 26757932

Refraction data survey: 2nd generation correlation of myopia.

Peter R Greene1, Antonio Medina2.   

Abstract

The objective herein is to provide refraction data, myopia progression rate, prevalence, and 1st and 2nd generation correlations, relevant to whether myopia is random or inherited. First- and second-generation ocular refraction data are assembled from N = 34 families, average of 2.8 children per family. From this group, data are available from N = 165 subjects. Inter-generation regressions are performed on all the data sets, including correlation coefficient r, and myopia prevalence [%]. Prevalence of myopia is [M] = 38.5 %. Prevalence of high myopes with |R| >6 D is [M-] = 20.5 %. Average refraction is <R> = -1.84 D ± 3.22 (N = 165). For the high myopes, |R| >6 D, prevalence for the parents is [M-] = 25 %, for the 2nd generation [M-] = 16.5 %. Average myopia level for the high myopes, both generations, is <S> = -7.52 D ± 1.31 D (N = 33). Regression parameters are calculated for all the data sets, yielding correlation coefficients in the range r = 0.48-0.72 for some groups of myopes and high myopes, fathers to daughters, and mothers to sons. Also of interest, some categories show essentially no correlation, -0.20 < r < 0.20, indicating that the refractive errors occur randomly. Time series results show myopia diopter rates = -0.50 D/year.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diopter rates; Emmetropia; Inter-generational correlation; Myopia; Progressive myopia; Refraction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26757932      PMCID: PMC6373766          DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0172-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  27 in total

1.  A retrospective study of myopia progression in adult contact lens wearers.

Authors:  Mark A Bullimore; Lisa A Jones; Melvin L Moeschberger; Karla Zadnik; Rick E Payor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Role of parental myopia in the progression of myopia and its interaction with treatment in COMET children.

Authors:  Daniel Kurtz; Leslie Hyman; Jane E Gwiazda; Ruth Manny; Li Ming Dong; Ying Wang; Mitchell Scheiman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Hereditary and environmental contributions to emmetropization and myopia.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Progressive Myopia and Lid Suture Myopia are Explained by the Same Feedback Process: a Mathematical Model of Myopia.

Authors:  Antonio Medina; Peter R Greene
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2015-06

5.  Changes in ocular refraction and its components among medical students--a 5-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  L L Lin; Y F Shih; Y C Lee; P T Hung; P K Hou
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Emmetropization as a first-order feedback system.

Authors:  A Medina; E Fariza
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Myopia profile in Copenhagen medical students 1996-98. Refractive stability over a century is suggested.

Authors:  H C Fledelius
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2000-10

8.  Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000.

Authors:  L L K Lin; Y F Shih; C K Hsiao; C J Chen
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.473

9.  Evidence of shared genes in refraction and axial length: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study.

Authors:  Mohamed Dirani; Sri N Shekar; Paul N Baird
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Nine loci for ocular axial length identified through genome-wide association studies, including shared loci with refractive error.

Authors:  Ching-Yu Cheng; Maria Schache; M Kamran Ikram; Terri L Young; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Veronique Vitart; Stuart MacGregor; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Veluchamy A Barathi; Jiemin Liao; Pirro G Hysi; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Beate St Pourcain; John P Kemp; George McMahon; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Grant W Montgomery; Aniket Mishra; Ya Xing Wang; Jie Jin Wang; Elena Rochtchina; Ozren Polasek; Alan F Wright; Najaf Amin; Elisabeth M van Leeuwen; James F Wilson; Craig E Pennell; Cornelia M van Duijn; Paulus T V M de Jong; Johannes R Vingerling; Xin Zhou; Peng Chen; Ruoying Li; Wan-Ting Tay; Yingfeng Zheng; Merwyn Chew; Kathryn P Burdon; Jamie E Craig; Sudha K Iyengar; Robert P Igo; Jonathan H Lass; Emily Y Chew; Toomas Haller; Evelin Mihailov; Andres Metspalu; Juho Wedenoja; Claire L Simpson; Robert Wojciechowski; René Höhn; Alireza Mirshahi; Tanja Zeller; Norbert Pfeiffer; Karl J Lackner; Thomas Bettecken; Thomas Meitinger; Konrad Oexle; Mario Pirastu; Laura Portas; Abhishek Nag; Katie M Williams; Ekaterina Yonova-Doing; Ronald Klein; Barbara E Klein; S Mohsen Hosseini; Andrew D Paterson; Kari-Matti Makela; Terho Lehtimaki; Mika Kahonen; Olli Raitakari; Nagahisa Yoshimura; Fumihiko Matsuda; Li Jia Chen; Chi Pui Pang; Shea Ping Yip; Maurice K H Yap; Akira Meguro; Nobuhisa Mizuki; Hidetoshi Inoko; Paul J Foster; Jing Hua Zhao; Eranga Vithana; E-Shyong Tai; Qiao Fan; Liang Xu; Harry Campbell; Brian Fleck; Igor Rudan; Tin Aung; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Goran Bencic; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Hannah Forward; Olavi Pärssinen; Paul Mitchell; Fernando Rivadeneira; Alex W Hewitt; Cathy Williams; Ben A Oostra; Yik-Ying Teo; Christopher J Hammond; Dwight Stambolian; David A Mackey; Caroline C W Klaver; Tien-Yin Wong; Seang-Mei Saw; Paul N Baird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevention of myopia by partial correction of hyperopia: a twins study.

Authors:  Antonio Medina
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Advanced myopia, prevalence and incidence analysis.

Authors:  Peter R Greene; Judith M Greene
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.