Literature DB >> 20024953

4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization.

Jelena Bock1, Alex Frydrychowicz, Aurélien F Stalder, Thorsten A Bley, Hans Burkhardt, Jürgen Hennig, Michael Markl.   

Abstract

Time-resolved phase contrast (PC) MRI with velocity encoding in three directions (flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI) can be employed to assess three-dimensional blood flow in the entire aortic lumen within a single measurement. These data can be used not only for the visualization of blood flow but also to derive additional information on vascular geometry with three-dimensional PC MR angiography (MRA). As PC-MRA is sensitive to available signal-to-noise ratio, standard and novel blood pool contrast agents may help to enhance PC-MRA image quality. In a group of 30 healthy volunteers, the influence of different contrast agents on vascular signal-to-noise ratio, PC-MRA quality, and subsequent three-dimensional stream-line visualization in the thoracic aorta was determined. Flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI data acquired with contrast agent provided significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio in magnitude data and noise reduction in velocity data compared to measurements without contrast media. The agreement of three-dimensional PC-MRA with reference standard contrast-enhanced MRA was good for both contrast agents, with improved PC-MRA performance for blood pool contrast agent, particularly for the smaller supra-aortic branches. For three-dimensional flow visualization, a trend toward improved results for the data with contrast agent was observed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20024953     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  65 in total

1.  Visualization of the ophthalmic artery by phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsutsumi; Yukimasa Yasumoto; Takashi Tabuchi; Masanori Ito
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging-based characterization of aortic morphometry and haemodynamics: impact of age, aortic diameter, and valve morphology.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Alex J Barker; Ian Murphy; Kelly Jarvis; Susanne Schnell; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Postoperative pulmonary and aortic 3D haemodynamics in patients after repair of transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Julia Geiger; Daniel Hirtler; Jonas Bürk; Brigitte Stiller; Raoul Arnold; Bernd Jung; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Assessment of uterine artery geometry and hemodynamics in human pregnancy with 4d flow mri and its correlation with doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Eileen Hwuang; Marta Vidorreta; Nadav Schwartz; Brianna F Moon; Kirpal Kochar; Matthew Dylan Tisdall; John A Detre; Walter R T Witschey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Wall shear stress distribution at the carotid bifurcation: influence of eversion carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  A Harloff; S Berg; A J Barker; J Schöllhorn; M Schumacher; C Weiller; M Markl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Fully automated 3D aortic segmentation of 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic analysis using deep learning.

Authors:  Haben Berhane; Michael Scott; Mohammed Elbaz; Kelly Jarvis; Patrick McCarthy; James Carr; Chris Malaisrie; Ryan Avery; Alex J Barker; Joshua D Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Comparison of blood flow velocity quantification by 4D flow MR imaging with ultrasound at the carotid bifurcation.

Authors:  A Harloff; T Zech; F Wegent; C Strecker; C Weiller; M Markl
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly Jarvis; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-12-09

9.  4D flow MR imaging of the portal venous system: a feasibility study in children.

Authors:  Keyur Parekh; Michael Markl; Michael Rose; Susanne Schnell; Andrada Popescu; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Measurements of wall shear stress and aortic pulse wave velocity in swine with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Andrew L Wentland; Oliver Wieben; Dhanansayan Shanmuganayagam; Christian G Krueger; Jennifer J Meudt; Daniel Consigny; Leonardo Rivera; Patrick E McBride; Jess D Reed; Thomas M Grist
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.