Literature DB >> 25822116

Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention.

Lisa G Aspinwall1, Tammy K Stump2, Jennifer M Taber2, Wendy Kohlmann3, Samantha L Leaf2,4, Sancy A Leachman3,5.   

Abstract

To determine whether receiving melanoma genetic test results undermines perceived control over melanoma prevention, control-related beliefs were examined among 60 adults from melanoma-prone families receiving CDKN2A/p16 test results (27 unaffected noncarriers, 15 unaffected carriers, 18 affected carriers; response rate at 2 years = 64.9 % of eligible respondents). Multilevel modeling of perceived control ratings over a 2-year period revealed significant variation in individual trajectories: most participants showed increases (45 %) or no change (38.3 %), while 16.7 % showed decreases. At the group level, noncarriers reported sustained increases through the 2-year follow-up (ps < .05); unaffected carriers reported significant short-term increases (ps < .05); and affected carriers reported no change. Participants in all groups continued to rate photoprotection as highly effective in reducing melanoma risk and reported decreased beliefs that carrying the p16 mutation would inevitably lead to the development of melanoma. Qualitative responses immediately following counseling and test reporting corroborated these findings, as 93 % indicated it was possible to either prevent (64.9 %) or decrease the likelihood (28.1 %) of future melanomas. Thus, genetic test reporting does not generally undermine perceived control over melanoma prevention, though variability in response to positive results warrants future study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDKN2A/p16; Familial melanoma; Genetic counseling; Genetic determinism; Perceived control; Prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25822116      PMCID: PMC4568125          DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9631-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  25 in total

1.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  C J Armitage; M Conner
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-12

2.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; John Weinman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Communication strategies for enhancing understanding of the behavioral implications of genetic and biomarker tests for disease risk: the role of coherence.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Theresa M Marteau; Paul M Brown; William M P Klein; Kerry A Sherman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-06-23

5.  Melanoma genetic counseling and test reporting improve screening adherence among unaffected carriers 2 years later.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Samantha L Leaf; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Population-based analysis of prognostic factors and survival in familial melanoma.

Authors:  Scott R Florell; Kenneth M Boucher; Gilda Garibotti; John Astle; Richard Kerber; Geraldine Mineau; Charles Wiggins; R Dirk Noyes; Alexander Tsodikov; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; John J Zone; Wolfram E Samlowski; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Deborah Bowen; Lawrence C Brody; Celeste M Condit; Robert T Croyle; Marta Gwinn; Muin J Khoury; Laura M Koehly; Bruce R Korf; Theresa M Marteau; Kenneth McLeroy; Kevin Patrick; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Genetic testing for hereditary melanoma and pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study of psychological outcome.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Samantha L Leaf; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Assignment of a locus for familial melanoma, MLM, to chromosome 9p13-p22.

Authors:  L A Cannon-Albright; D E Goldgar; L J Meyer; C M Lewis; D E Anderson; J W Fountain; M E Hegi; R W Wiseman; E M Petty; A E Bale
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Analysis of the p16 gene (CDKN2) as a candidate for the chromosome 9p melanoma susceptibility locus.

Authors:  A Kamb; D Shattuck-Eidens; R Eeles; Q Liu; N A Gruis; W Ding; C Hussey; T Tran; Y Miki; J Weaver-Feldhaus
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  7 in total

1.  Current directions in behavioral medicine research on genetic testing for disease susceptibility: introduction to the special section.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-10

2.  An experiment assessing effects of personalized feedback about genetic susceptibility to obesity on attitudes towards diet and exercise.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Matthew S Lebowitz
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Self-Regulation Principles Underlying Risk Perception and Decision Making within the Context of Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Ellen Peters; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2017-05-05

4.  Interactive Beliefs about Genes and Behavior Predict Improved Sun Protection Following Melanoma Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Danielle M Drummond; Tammy K Stump; Wendy K Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-08-02

5.  Genetic test reporting of CDKN2A provides informational and motivational benefits for managing melanoma risk.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Jennifer M Taber; Danielle M Drummond; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study randomised controlled trial: statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Serigne N Lo; Amelia K Smit; David Espinoza; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Interest in and reactions to genetic risk information: The role of implicit theories and self-affirmation.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Susan Persky; Rebecca A Ferrer; Annette R Kaufman; Chan L Thai; Peter R Harris
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.