Literature DB >> 28837820

An experiment assessing effects of personalized feedback about genetic susceptibility to obesity on attitudes towards diet and exercise.

Woo-Kyoung Ahn1, Matthew S Lebowitz2.   

Abstract

As increasing attention is paid to possible genetic influences on susceptibility to obesity, recent studies have examined how genetic attributions can impact laypeople's weight-related attitudes and eating behavior. Little consideration, however, has been devoted to understanding the potential effects of learning that one does not have a genetic predisposition to obesity. The present study investigated the possibility that such feedback might bring about negative consequences by making people feel invulnerable to weight gain, which is termed a genetic invincibility effect. After conducting a saliva test disguised as genetic screening, participants were randomly assigned to be told that there was either a very high or very low chance that they carried genes known to increase one's risk of developing obesity. Participants who were told that they were not genetically predisposed to obesity judged the efficacy of healthy diet and exercise habits to be significantly lower than did those who were told that they were genetically predisposed and those who did not receive any genetic feedback. When prompted to select a meal from a menu of options, participants who were told that they were not genetically predisposed to obesity were also more likely than others to select unhealthy foods. These findings demonstrate the existence of a genetic invincibility effect, suggesting that personalized feedback indicating the absence of a genetic liability could have negative psychological consequences with substantial health-related implications.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28837820      PMCID: PMC5680145          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  33 in total

1.  The influence of calorie and physical activity labelling on snack and beverage choices.

Authors:  U Masic; P Christiansen; E J Boyland
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Public opinion and the politics of obesity in America.

Authors:  J Eric Oliver; Taeku Lee
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.265

3.  An investigation of behavioural adaptation to airbags and antilock brakes among taxi drivers.

Authors:  F Sagberg; S Fosser; I A Saetermo
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1997-05

Review 4.  Genetic Testing for Obesity: Implications and Challenges.

Authors:  Mary Segal
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-03

5.  Experiential versus genetic accounts of inactivity: implications for inactive individuals' self-efficacy beliefs and intentions to exercise.

Authors:  Mark R Beauchamp; Ryan E Rhodes; Christiane Kreutzer; James L Rupert
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.104

6.  Testing positive for a genetic predisposition to depression magnifies retrospective memory for depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Woo-Kyoung Ahn
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2017-11

7.  Blue Genes? Understanding and Mitigating Negative Consequences of Personalized Information about Genetic Risk for Depression.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Woo-Kyoung Ahn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Melanoma genetic counseling and test reporting improve screening adherence among unaffected carriers 2 years later.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Samantha L Leaf; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Lay theories of obesity predict actual body mass.

Authors:  Brent McFerran; Anirban Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-06-05

10.  Can merely learning about obesity genes affect eating behavior?

Authors:  Ilan Dar-Nimrod; Benjamin Y Cheung; Matthew B Ruby; Steven J Heine
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  4 in total

1.  Learning one's genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk.

Authors:  Bradley P Turnwald; J Parker Goyer; Danielle Z Boles; Amy Silder; Scott L Delp; Alia J Crum
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-12-10

Review 2.  Genetic variation in satiety signaling and hypothalamic inflammation: merging fields for the study of obesity.

Authors:  Alexandria Maria Szalanczy; Chia-Chi Chuang Key; Leah Catherine Solberg Woods
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  The symptom discounting effect: what to do when negative genetic test results become risk factors for alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Annalise M Perricone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Experimentally exploring the potential behavioral effects of personalized genetic information about marijuana and schizophrenia risk.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Paul S Appelbaum; Lisa B Dixon; Ragy R Girgis; Melanie M Wall
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.250

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.