PURPOSE: Familial melanoma patients are reported to present with thinner melanomas, to be younger at the time of diagnosis, and to have a greater likelihood of developing multiple primary tumors. We sought to determine whether melanomas that occur in a familial setting demonstrate different prognostic and survival statistics relative to sporadic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This population-based study used the Utah Cancer Registry and Utah Population Database to objectively evaluate prognostic and survival statistics of the familial melanoma population. From 1973 to 1999, there were 7,785 cases of invasive melanoma identified through the Utah Cancer Registry. These were linked to the Utah Population Database, resulting in 2,659 subjects with family-history information from which a familiality score could be calculated. Cases scored in the top ninth percentile were assigned as high familial risk, and the remaining 91% were considered low familial risk. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic-regression analysis found no association between sex, Breslow depth, Clark level, or survival and the familial status. Age at first diagnosis of invasive melanoma was slightly lower in the high-familial-risk group (57 v 60 years; P = .03). High-familial-risk subjects had more melanomas diagnosed at age 30 or younger (12% v 6%; P < .001). A significant difference in the overall number of individuals with two or more primary malignant melanomas was not detected among the groups (P = .2). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that melanomas occurring in the context of an underlying inherited susceptibility do not have a significantly different biologic behavior.
PURPOSE:Familial melanomapatients are reported to present with thinner melanomas, to be younger at the time of diagnosis, and to have a greater likelihood of developing multiple primary tumors. We sought to determine whether melanomas that occur in a familial setting demonstrate different prognostic and survival statistics relative to sporadic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This population-based study used the Utah Cancer Registry and Utah Population Database to objectively evaluate prognostic and survival statistics of the familial melanoma population. From 1973 to 1999, there were 7,785 cases of invasive melanoma identified through the Utah Cancer Registry. These were linked to the Utah Population Database, resulting in 2,659 subjects with family-history information from which a familiality score could be calculated. Cases scored in the top ninth percentile were assigned as high familial risk, and the remaining 91% were considered low familial risk. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic-regression analysis found no association between sex, Breslow depth, Clark level, or survival and the familial status. Age at first diagnosis of invasive melanoma was slightly lower in the high-familial-risk group (57 v 60 years; P = .03). High-familial-risk subjects had more melanomas diagnosed at age 30 or younger (12% v 6%; P < .001). A significant difference in the overall number of individuals with two or more primary malignant melanomas was not detected among the groups (P = .2). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that melanomas occurring in the context of an underlying inherited susceptibility do not have a significantly different biologic behavior.
Authors: Kyriaki Antonopoulou; Irene Stefanaki; Christina M Lill; Foteini Chatzinasiou; Katerina P Kypreou; Fani Karagianni; Emmanouil Athanasiadis; George M Spyrou; John P A Ioannidis; Lars Bertram; Evangelos Evangelou; Alexander J Stratigos Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Miriam Potrony; Celia Badenas; Paula Aguilera; Joan Anton Puig-Butille; Cristina Carrera; Josep Malvehy; Susana Puig Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2015-09
Authors: Nicholas J Taylor; Nandita Mitra; Lu Qian; Marie-Françoise Avril; D Timothy Bishop; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; William Bruno; Donato Calista; Francisco Cuellar; Anne E Cust; Florence Demenais; David E Elder; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Paola Ghiorzo; Alisa M Goldstein; Thais C Grazziotin; Nelleke A Gruis; Johan Hansson; Mark Harland; Nicholas K Hayward; Marko Hocevar; Veronica Höiom; Elizabeth A Holland; Christian Ingvar; Maria Teresa Landi; Gilles Landman; Alejandra Larre-Borges; Graham J Mann; Eduardo Nagore; Håkan Olsson; Jane M Palmer; Barbara Perić; Dace Pjanova; Antonia L Pritchard; Susana Puig; Helen Schmid; Nienke van der Stoep; Margaret A Tucker; Karin A W Wadt; Xiaohong R Yang; Julia A Newton-Bishop; Peter A Kanetsky Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Yelena P Wu; Wendy Kohlmann; Karen Curtin; Zhe Yu; Heidi A Hanson; Mia Hashibe; Bridget G Parsons; Jathine Wong; Joshua D Schiffman; Douglas Grossman; Sancy A Leachman Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Michael R Sargen; Donato Calista; David E Elder; Daniela Massi; Emily Y Chu; Míriam Potrony; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Cristina Carrera; Paula Aguilera; Llucia Alos; Susana Puig; Rosalie Elenitsas; Xiaohong R Yang; Margaret A Tucker; Maria Teresa Landi; Alisa M Goldstein Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 11.527