Literature DB >> 23382133

Genetic testing for hereditary melanoma and pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study of psychological outcome.

Lisa G Aspinwall1, Jennifer M Taber, Samantha L Leaf, Wendy Kohlmann, Sancy A Leachman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: CDKN2A/p16 mutations confer 76% lifetime risk of melanoma and up to 17% lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer. Our objective was to determine the short- and long-term impact of CDKN2A/p16 genetic counseling and test reporting on psychological distress, cancer worry, and perceived costs and benefits of testing.
METHODS: Prospective changes in anxiety, depression, and cancer worry following CDKN2A/p16 counseling and test reporting were evaluated at multiple assessments over 2 years among 60 adult members of melanoma-prone families; 37 participants completed the 2-year follow-up. Quantitative and qualitative assessments of the costs and benefits of testing were carried out. Outcomes were evaluated among unaffected noncarriers (n = 27), unaffected carriers (n = 15), and affected carriers (n = 18).
RESULTS: Reported anxiety and depression were low. For carriers and noncarriers, anxiety decreased significantly throughout the 2-year period, whereas depression and melanoma worry showed short-term decreases. Worry about pancreatic cancer was low and decreased significantly. In all groups, test-related distress and uncertainty were low, regret was absent, and positive experiences were high. All participants (>93% at each assessment) reported at least one perceived benefit of genetic testing; only 15.9% listed any negative aspect. Carriers reported increased knowledge about melanoma risk and prevention (78.3%) and increased prevention and screening behaviors for self and family (65.2%). Noncarriers reported increased knowledge (95.2%) and emotional benefits (71.4%).
CONCLUSION: Among US participants familiar with their hereditary melanoma risk through prior epidemiological research participation, CDKN2A/p16 genetic testing provides multiple perceived benefits to both carriers and noncarriers without inducing distress in general or worry about melanoma or pancreatic cancer.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 23382133     DOI: 10.1002/pon.2080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  20 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to risk-understanding and risk-reduction behaviors among individuals with a family history of melanoma.

Authors:  Laura Fitzpatrick; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

2.  Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-31

3.  Melanoma genetic counseling and test reporting improve screening adherence among unaffected carriers 2 years later.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Samantha L Leaf; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Hereditary melanoma: Update on syndromes and management: Genetics of familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome.

Authors:  Efthymia Soura; Philip J Eliades; Kristen Shannon; Alexander J Stratigos; Hensin Tsao
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Discussion of photoprotection, screening, and risk behaviors with children and grandchildren after melanoma genetic testing.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Timothy C Michaelis; Tammy Stump; Wendy G Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-06-23

6.  Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Emma R Leof; Kari G Rabe; Jennifer B McCormick; Gloria M Petersen; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Genetic test reporting of CDKN2A provides informational and motivational benefits for managing melanoma risk.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Jennifer M Taber; Danielle M Drummond; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Priority of Risk (But Not Perceived Magnitude of Risk) Predicts Improved Sun-Protection Behavior Following Genetic Counseling for Familial Melanoma.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Danielle M Drummond; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-02-12

10.  Genetic Test Reporting and Counseling for Melanoma Risk in Minors May Improve Sun Protection Without Inducing Distress.

Authors:  Tammy K Stump; Lisa G Aspinwall; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Jamie Hauglid; Yelena P Wu; Emily Scott; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.