Literature DB >> 25813463

Quantifying Adventitious Error in a Covariance Structure as a Random Effect.

Hao Wu1, Michael W Browne.   

Abstract

We present an approach to quantifying errors in covariance structures in which adventitious error, identified as the process underlying the discrepancy between the population and the structured model, is explicitly modeled as a random effect with a distribution, and the dispersion parameter of this distribution to be estimated gives a measure of misspecification. Analytical properties of the resultant procedure are investigated and the measure of misspecification is found to be related to the root mean square error of approximation. An algorithm is developed for numerical implementation of the procedure. The consistency and asymptotic sampling distributions of the estimators are established under a new asymptotic paradigm and an assumption weaker than the standard Pitman drift assumption. Simulations validate the asymptotic sampling distributions and demonstrate the importance of accounting for the variations in the parameter estimates due to adventitious error. Two examples are also given as illustrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25813463      PMCID: PMC5439333          DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9451-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  8 in total

1.  Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification.

Authors:  R Cudeck; S J Henly
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  2001 Presidential Address: Working with Imperfect Models.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Recovery of Weak Common Factors by Maximum Likelihood and Ordinary Least Squares Estimation.

Authors:  Nancy E Briggs; Robert C MacCallum
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Noncentral Chi-Square Versus Normal Distributions in Describing the Likelihood Ratio Statistic: The Univariate Case and Its Multivariate Implication.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Normal Versus Noncentral Chi-square Asymptotics of Misspecified Models.

Authors:  So Yeon Chun; Alexander Shapiro
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The use of likelihood-based confidence intervals in genetic models.

Authors:  M C Neale; M B Miller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Adjusted confidence intervals for a bounded parameter.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.805

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Random Model Discrepancy: Interpretations and Technicalities (A Rejoinder).

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael W Browne
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Advances in Modeling Model Discrepancy: Comment on Wu and Browne (2015).

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Anthony O'Hagan
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic.

Authors:  So Yeon Chun; Michael W Browne; Alexander Shapiro
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Assessing the Size of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Creating Misspecified Models in Moment Structure Analysis.

Authors:  Keke Lai
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish; Melissa G Wolf
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-18

7.  Reanalysis of the German PISA Data: A Comparison of Different Approaches for Trend Estimation With a Particular Emphasis on Mode Effects.

Authors:  Alexander Robitzsch; Oliver Lüdtke; Frank Goldhammer; Ulf Kroehne; Olaf Köller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.