Literature DB >> 22971875

Adjusted confidence intervals for a bounded parameter.

Hao Wu1, Michael C Neale.   

Abstract

It is well known that the regular likelihood ratio test of a bounded parameter is not valid if the boundary value is being tested. This is the case for testing the null value of a scalar variance component. Although an adjusted test of variance component has been suggested to account for the effect of its lower bound of zero, no adjustment of its interval estimate has ever been proposed. If left unadjusted, the confidence interval of the variance may still contain zero when the adjusted test rejects the null hypothesis of a zero variance, leading to conflicting conclusions. In this research, we propose two ways to adjust the confidence interval of a parameter subject to a lower bound, one based on the Wald test and the other on the likelihood ratio test. Both are compatible to the adjusted test and parametrization-invariant. A simulation study and two examples are given in the framework of ACDE models in twin studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971875      PMCID: PMC3486787          DOI: 10.1007/s10519-012-9560-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  7 in total

1.  Cholesky problems.

Authors:  Gregory Carey
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.587

3.  Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Annica Dominicus; Anders Skrondal; Håkon K Gjessing; Nancy L Pedersen; Juni Palmgren
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  The use of likelihood-based confidence intervals in genetic models.

Authors:  M C Neale; M B Miller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Fitting genetic models with LISREL: hypothesis testing.

Authors:  M C Neale; A C Heath; J K Hewitt; L J Eaves; D W Fulker
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework.

Authors:  Steven Boker; Michael Neale; Hermine Maes; Michael Wilde; Michael Spiegel; Timothy Brick; Jeffrey Spies; Ryne Estabrook; Sarah Kenny; Timothy Bates; Paras Mehta; John Fox
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.500

  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Type I Error Rates and Parameter Bias in Multivariate Behavioral Genetic Models.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst; Elizabeth Prom-Wormley; Matthew Keller; Sarah Medland; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Profile Likelihood-Based Confidence Intervals and Regions for Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Jolynn Pek; Hao Wu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Does degree of gyrification underlie the phenotypic and genetic associations between cortical surface area and cognitive ability?

Authors:  Anna R Docherty; Donald J Hagler; Matthew S Panizzon; Michael C Neale; Lisa T Eyler; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Carol E Franz; Amy Jak; Michael J Lyons; Daniel A Rinker; Wesley K Thompson; Ming T Tsuang; Anders M Dale; William S Kremen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Notes on Three Decades of Methodology Workshops.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Quantifying Adventitious Error in a Covariance Structure as a Random Effect.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael W Browne
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a parameter with an upper or lower bound.

Authors:  Joshua N Pritikin; Lance M Rappaport; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 6.125

7.  A Power Calculator for the Classical Twin Design.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Genetic relationship between the addiction diagnosis in adults and their childhood measure of addiction liability.

Authors:  Michael Vanyukov; Kevin Kim; Daniel Irons; Levent Kirisci; Michael Neale; Ty Ridenour; Brian Hicks; Ralph Tarter; Maureen Reynolds; Galina Kirillova; Matt McGue; William Iacono
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  The heritability of alcohol use disorders: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies.

Authors:  B Verhulst; M C Neale; K S Kendler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Applying Multivariate Discrete Distributions to Genetically Informative Count Data.

Authors:  Robert M Kirkpatrick; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.