Literature DB >> 28597361

Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic.

So Yeon Chun1, Michael W Browne2, Alexander Shapiro3.   

Abstract

Covariance structure analysis and its structural equation modeling extensions have become one of the most widely used methodologies in social sciences such as psychology, education, and economics. An important issue in such analysis is to assess the goodness of fit of a model under analysis. One of the most popular test statistics used in covariance structure analysis is the asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) test statistic introduced by Browne (Br J Math Stat Psychol 37:62-83, 1984). The ADF statistic can be used to test models without any specific distribution assumption (e.g., multivariate normal distribution) of the observed data. Despite its advantage, it has been shown in various empirical studies that unless sample sizes are extremely large, this ADF statistic could perform very poorly in practice. In this paper, we provide a theoretical explanation for this phenomenon and further propose a modified test statistic that improves the performance in samples of realistic size. The proposed statistic deals with the possible ill-conditioning of the involved large-scale covariance matrices.

Keywords:  Chi-square distribution; asymptotics; covariance structures; distribution-free test statistic; ill-conditioned problem

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28597361     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-017-9574-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  8 in total

1.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?

Authors:  L T Hu; P M Bentler; Y Kano
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Normal Versus Noncentral Chi-square Asymptotics of Misspecified Models.

Authors:  So Yeon Chun; Alexander Shapiro
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions.

Authors:  Andrew J Tomarken; Niels G Waller
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 18.561

4.  Comment on the asymptotics of a distribution-free goodness of fit test statistic.

Authors:  Michael W Browne; Alexander Shapiro
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  The nonsingularity of γ in covariance structure analysis of nonnormal data.

Authors:  Robert Jennrich; Albert Satorra
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modelling.

Authors:  K H Yuan; P M Bentler
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Quantifying Adventitious Error in a Covariance Structure as a Random Effect.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael W Browne
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Effect of Latent and Error Non-Normality on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Lisa J Jobst; Max Auerswald; Morten Moshagen
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.088

2.  Structural Equation Modeling With Many Variables: A Systematic Review of Issues and Developments.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Miao Yang; Katerina M Marcoulides
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.