Literature DB >> 28176040

Assessing the Size of Model Misfit in Structural Equation Models.

Alberto Maydeu-Olivares1,2.   

Abstract

When a statistically significant mean difference is found, the magnitude of the difference is judged qualitatively using an effect size such as Cohen's d. In contrast, in a structural equation model (SEM), the result of the statistical test of model fit is often disregarded if significant, and inferences are drawn using "close" models retained based on point estimates of sample statistics (goodness-of-fit indices). However, when a SEM cannot be retained using a test of exact fit, all substantive inferences drawn from it are suspect. It is therefore important to determine the size of the model misfit. Standardized residual covariances and residual correlations provide standardized effect sizes of the misfit of SEM models. They can be summarized using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMSR) and the Correlation Root Mean Squared Residual (CRMSR) which can be used as overall effect sizes of the misfit. Statistical theory is provided that allows the construction of confidence intervals and tests of close fit based on the SRMSR and CRMSR. It is hoped that the use of standardized effect sizes of misfit will help reconcile current practices in SEM and elsewhere in statistics.

Keywords:  RMSEA; effect size; goodness-of-fit

Year:  2017        PMID: 28176040     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  13 in total

1.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.

Authors:  Roderick P McDonald; Moon-Ho Ringo Ho
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

2.  Fitting data to model: structural equation modeling diagnosis using two scatter plots.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Kentaro Hayashi
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-12

3.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.

Authors:  J H Steiger
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Feinian Chen; Patrick J Curran; Kenneth A Bollen; James Kirby; Pamela Paxton
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2008-01-01

5.  Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modelling.

Authors:  K H Yuan; P M Bentler
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  A Comment on a Paper by H. Wu and M. W. Browne (2014).

Authors:  Albert Satorra
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Quantifying Adventitious Error in a Covariance Structure as a Random Effect.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael W Browne
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis.

Authors:  R C MacCallum; D T Wegener; B N Uchino; L R Fabrigar
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

View more
  15 in total

1.  New Developments in Factor Score Regression: Fit Indices and a Model Comparison Test.

Authors:  Ines Devlieger; Wouter Talloen; Yves Rosseel
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.

Authors:  Dexin Shi; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  An Explanatory Model of the Relationships between Physical Activity, Social Support and Screen Time among Adolescents.

Authors:  Daniel Sanz-Martín; Eduardo Melguizo-Ibáñez; Germán Ruiz-Tendero; José Luis Ubago-Jiménez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Goran Pavlov; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Dexin Shi
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Jon D Elhai; Haibo Yang; Dean McKay; Gordon J G Asmundson
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Are need for affect and cognition culture dependent? Implications for global public health campaigns: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Bei Zhu; Chunlan Yuan; Chao Zhao; Jiaofeng Wang; Qingwei Ruan; Chao Han; Zhijun Bao; Jie Chen; Kevin Vin Arceneaux; Ryan Vander Wielen; Greg J Siegle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Health anxiety related to problematic smartphone use and gaming disorder severity during COVID-19: Fear of missing out as a mediator.

Authors:  Jon D Elhai; Dean McKay; Haibo Yang; Charlene Minaya; Christian Montag; Gordon J G Asmundson
Journal:  Hum Behav Emerg Technol       Date:  2020-11-23

8.  Relating Parkinson freezing and balance domains: A structural equation modeling approach.

Authors:  Daniel S Peterson; Charles Van Liew; Samuel Stuart; Patricia Carlson-Kuhta; Fay B Horak; Martina Mancini
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.891

9.  Psychometric validation and refinement of the Interoception Sensory Questionnaire (ISQ) in adolescents and adults on the autism spectrum.

Authors:  Evan Suzman; Zachary J Williams; Jacob I Feldman; Michelle Failla; Carissa J Cascio; Mark T Wallace; Maria Niarchou; James S Sutcliffe; Ericka Wodka; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.476

10.  Structural Equation Modeling With Many Variables: A Systematic Review of Issues and Developments.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Miao Yang; Katerina M Marcoulides
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.