Literature DB >> 2062982

Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification.

R Cudeck1, S J Henly.   

Abstract

Complex models for covariance matrices are structures that specify many parameters, whereas simple models require only a few. When a set of models of differing complexity is evaluated by means of some goodness of fit indices, structures with many parameters are more likely to be selected when the number of observations is large, regardless of other utility considerations. This is known as the sample size problem in model selection decisions. This article argues that this influence of sample size is not necessarily undesirable. The rationale behind this point of view is described in terms of the relationships among the population covariance matrix and 2 model-based estimates of it. The implications of these relationships for practical use are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2062982     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  21 in total

1.  Autonomy and Relatedness in Inner-City Families of Substance Abusing Adolescents.

Authors:  Jessica Samuolis; Aaron Hogue; Sarah Dauber; Howard A Liddle
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2006-01-01

2.  Analyzing growth and change: latent variable growth curve modeling with an application to clinical trials.

Authors:  Donald E Stull
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Commentary on strengthening the assessment of factorial invariance across population subgroups: a commentary on Varni et al. (2013).

Authors:  A Alexander Beaujean; Christine A Limbers; James W Varni
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Model error in covariance structure models: Some implications for power and Type I error.

Authors:  Donna L Coffman
Journal:  Methodology (Gott)       Date:  2008-01-01

5.  Advances in Modeling Model Discrepancy: Comment on Wu and Browne (2015).

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Anthony O'Hagan
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Po-Hsien Huang; Hung Chen; Li-Jen Weng
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Po-Hsien Huang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Creating Misspecified Models in Moment Structure Analysis.

Authors:  Keke Lai
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Quantifying Adventitious Error in a Covariance Structure as a Random Effect.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Michael W Browne
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Evaluation of multidimensional models of WAIS-IV subtest performance.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.