Literature DB >> 25811096

Reduction of radiation exposure by lead curtain shielding in dedicated extremity cone beam CT.

C-H Lee1, J H Ryu, Y-H Lee, K-H Yoon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A dedicated extremity cone beam CT (CBCT) was introduced recently, and is rapidly becoming an attractive modality for extremity imaging. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a curtain-shaped lead shielding in reducing the exposure of patients to scattered radiation in dedicated extremity CBCT.
METHODS: A dedicated extremity CBCT scanner was used. The lead shielding curtain was 42 × 60 cm with 0.5-mm lead equivalent. Scattered radiation dose from CBCT was measured using thermoluminescence dosimetry chips at 20 points, at different distances and directions from the CT gantry. Two sets of scattered radiation dose measurements were performed before and after installation of curtain-shaped lead shield, and the percentage reduction in dose in air was calculated.
RESULTS: Mean radiation exposure dose at measured points was 34.46 ± 48.40 μGy without curtains and 9.67 ± 4.53 μGy with curtains, exhibiting 71.94% reduction (p = 0.000). The use of lead shielding curtains significantly reduced scattered radiation at 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 m from the CT gantry, with percent reductions of 84.8%, 58.0% and 35.5%, respectively (p = 0.000, 0.000 and 0.002). The percent reduction in the diagonal (+45°, -45°) and vertical forward (0°) directions were 86.3%, 83.1% and 77.7%, respectively, and were statistically significant (p = 0.029, 0.020 and 0.041).
CONCLUSION: Shielding with lead curtains suggests an easy and effective method for reducing patient exposure to radiation in extremity CBCT imaging. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Lead shielding curtains are an effective technique to reduce scattered radiation dose in dedicated extremity CBCT, with higher dose reduction closer to the gantry opening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25811096      PMCID: PMC4628457          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  13 in total

Review 1.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  An investigation of operator exposure in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Beth A Schueler; Thomas J Vrieze; Haraldur Bjarnason; Anthony W Stanson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters.

Authors:  Juha Koivisto; Timo Kiljunen; Jan Wolff; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Diagnosing scaphoid fractures: radiographs cannot be used as a gold standard!

Authors:  M M Tiel-van Buul; E J van Beek; A H Broekhuizen; E A Nooitgedacht; P H Davids; A J Bakker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Weight-bearing CT imaging of the lower extremity.

Authors:  Esa K J Tuominen; Jussi Kankare; Seppo K Koskinen; Kimmo T Mattila
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization.

Authors:  W Zbijewski; P De Jean; P Prakash; Y Ding; J W Stayman; N Packard; R Senn; D Yang; J Yorkston; A Machado; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  CT fluoroscopy shielding: decreases in scattered radiation for the patient and operator.

Authors:  Ziv Neeman; Sergio A Dromi; Shawn Sarin; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  CT arthrography of the wrist using a novel, mobile, dedicated extremity cone-beam CT (CBCT).

Authors:  Seppo K Koskinen; Ville V Haapamäki; Jari Salo; Nina C Lindfors; Mika Kortesniemi; Lauri Seppälä; Kimmo T Mattila
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Niccolò Faccioli; Giovanni Foti; Marco Barillari; Andrea Atzei; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Simple methods to reduce patient dose in a Varian cone beam CT system for delivery verification in pelvic radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Roxby; T Kron; F Foroudi; A Haworth; C Fox; A Mullen; J Cramb
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  4 in total

1.  Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data?

Authors:  Ana Elisa Colle Kauling; Christine Keul; Kurt Erdelt; Jan Kühnisch; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and radiography for scaphoid fractures.

Authors:  Jakob Neubauer; Matthias Benndorf; Claudia Ehritt-Braun; Kilian Reising; Tayfun Yilmaz; Christopher Klein; Horst Zajonc; Elmar Kotter; Mathias Langer; Sebastian Moritz Goerke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  The use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in radiocarpal fractures: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma Fitzpatrick; Vivek Sharma; Djamila Rojoa; Firas Raheman; Harvinder Singh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma.

Authors:  Sebastian Tschauner; Robert Marterer; Eszter Nagy; Georg Singer; Michael Riccabona; Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.