Literature DB >> 26971476

Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter.

Nathan D Maxfield1, Wendy L Olsen2, Daniel Kleinman3, Stefan A Frisch2, Victor S Ferreira4, Jennifer J Lister2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether language production is atypically resource-demanding in adults who stutter (AWS) versus typically-fluent adults (TFA).
METHODS: Fifteen TFA and 15 AWS named pictures overlaid with printed Semantic, Phonological or Unrelated Distractor words while monitoring frequent low tones versus rare high tones. Tones were presented at a short or long Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA) relative to picture onset. Group, Tone Type, Tone SOA and Distractor Type effects on P3 amplitudes were the main focus. P3 amplitude was also investigated separately in a simple tone oddball task.
RESULTS: P3 morphology was similar between groups in the simple task. In the dual task, a P3 effect was detected in TFA in all three distractor conditions at each Tone SOA. In AWS, a P3 effect was attenuated or undetectable at the Short Tone SOA depending on Distractor Type.
CONCLUSIONS: In TFA, attentional resources were available for P3-indexed processes in tone perception and categorization in all distractor conditions at both Tone SOAs. For AWS, availability of attentional resources for secondary task processing was reduced as competition in word retrieval was resolved. SIGNIFICANCE: Results suggest that language production can be atypically resource-demanding in AWS. Theoretical and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.
Copyright © 2016 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Attention; Brain electrophysiology; Language production; Stuttering

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26971476      PMCID: PMC4792332          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  81 in total

Review 1.  Linking brainwaves to the brain: an ERP primer.

Authors:  Alexandra P Fonaryova Key; Guy O Dove; Mandy J Maguire
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Role of the right and left hemispheres in recovery of function during treatment of intention in aphasia.

Authors:  Bruce Crosson; Anna Bacon Moore; Kaundinya Gopinath; Keith D White; Christina E Wierenga; Megan E Gaiefsky; Katherine S Fabrizio; Kyung K Peck; David Soltysik; Christina Milsted; Richard W Briggs; Tim W Conway; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Long latency auditory evoked potentials: intensity, inter-stimulus interval, and habituation.

Authors:  J Polich; M Aung; D J Dalessio
Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci       Date:  1988 Jan-Mar

5.  Normal variation of P300 from auditory stimuli.

Authors:  J Polich
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-05

6.  Effects of aerobic exercise and gender on visual and auditory P300, reaction time, and accuracy.

Authors:  Y Yagi; K L Coburn; K M Estes; J E Arruda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1999-10

7.  Stuttering and work life: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Authors:  Geraldine Bricker-Katz; Michelle Lincoln; Steven Cumming
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.538

8.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Reaction times of moderate and severe stutterers to monaural verbal stimuli: some implications for neurolinguistic organization.

Authors:  M P Rastatter; C W Dell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1987-03

10.  Attention demands of spoken word planning: a review.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs; Vitória Piai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  The Influence of Executive Functions on Phonemic Processing in Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Shriya Basu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Inhibitory Control of Lexical Selection in Adults who Stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.

Authors:  Erica Lescht; Michael Walsh Dickey; Melissa D Stockbridge; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Cognitive control of action naming in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  Interference in speaking while hearing and vice versa.

Authors:  Raphaël Fargier; Marina Laganaro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Long-latency auditory evoked potential in children with stuttering.

Authors:  Gislaine Machado Jerônimo; Ana Paula Rigatti Scherer; Pricila Sleifer
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-06-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.