Literature DB >> 28973156

Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.

Nathan D Maxfield1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Some psycholinguistic theories of stuttering propose that language production operates along a different time course in adults who stutter (AWS) versus typically fluent adults (TFA). However, behavioral evidence for such a difference has been mixed. Here, the time course of semantic and phonological encoding in picture naming was compared in AWS (n = 16) versus TFA (n = 16) by measuring 2 event-related potential (ERP) components: NoGo N200, an ERP index of response inhibition, and lateralized readiness potential, an ERP index of response preparation. Method: Each trial required a semantic judgment about a picture in addition to a phonemic judgment about the target label of the picture. Judgments were mapped onto a dual-choice (Go-NoGo/left-right) push-button response paradigm. On each trial, ERP activity time-locked to picture onset was recorded at 32 scalp electrodes.
Results: NoGo N200 was detected earlier to semantic NoGo trials than to phonemic NoGo trials in both groups, replicating previous evidence that semantic encoding generally precedes phonological encoding in language production. Moreover, N200 onset was earlier to semantic NoGo trials in TFA than in AWS, indicating that semantic information triggering response inhibition became available earlier in TFA versus AWS. In contrast, the time course of N200 activity to phonemic NoGo trials did not differ between groups. Lateralized readiness potential activity was influenced by strategic response preparation and, thus, could not be used to index real-time semantic and phonological encoding.
Conclusion: NoGo N200 results point to slowed semantic encoding in AWS versus TFA. Discussion considers possible factors in slowed semantic encoding in AWS and how fluency might be impacted by slowed semantic encoding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28973156      PMCID: PMC5945065          DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  75 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Recent developments in speech motor research into stuttering.

Authors:  H F Peters; W Hulstijn; P H Van Lieshout
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2000 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 0.849

3.  A comparative investigation of the speech-associated coping responses reported by adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Martine Vanryckeghem; Gene J Brutten; Nizam Uddin; John Van Borsel
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.538

Review 4.  Picture naming.

Authors:  W R Glaser
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

Review 5.  A theory of neuropsycholinguistic function in stuttering.

Authors:  W H Perkins; R D Kent; R F Curlee
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

6.  Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in lexical priming of young children who stutter: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Kia N Hartfield; Edward G Conture
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 2.538

7.  Studies of squeezing: handedness, responding hand, response force, and asymmetry of readiness potential.

Authors:  M Kutas; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Amanda Hampton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Reaction times of moderate and severe stutterers to monaural verbal stimuli: some implications for neurolinguistic organization.

Authors:  M P Rastatter; C W Dell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1987-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Inhibitory Control of Lexical Selection in Adults who Stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.

Authors:  Erica Lescht; Michael Walsh Dickey; Melissa D Stockbridge; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Cognitive control of action naming in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.538

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.