Literature DB >> 25778704

Selection on noise constrains variation in a eukaryotic promoter.

Brian P H Metzger1, David C Yuan2, Jonathan D Gruber1, Fabien Duveau1, Patricia J Wittkopp3.   

Abstract

Genetic variation segregating within a species reflects the combined activities of mutation, selection, and genetic drift. In the absence of selection, polymorphisms are expected to be a random subset of new mutations; thus, comparing the effects of polymorphisms and new mutations provides a test for selection. When evidence of selection exists, such comparisons can identify properties of mutations that are most likely to persist in natural populations. Here we investigate how mutation and selection have shaped variation in a cis-regulatory sequence controlling gene expression by empirically determining the effects of polymorphisms segregating in the TDH3 promoter among 85 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and comparing their effects to a distribution of mutational effects defined by 236 point mutations in the same promoter. Surprisingly, we find that selection on expression noise (that is, variability in expression among genetically identical cells) appears to have had a greater impact on sequence variation in the TDH3 promoter than selection on mean expression level. This is not necessarily because variation in expression noise impacts fitness more than variation in mean expression level, but rather because of differences in the distributions of mutational effects for these two phenotypes. This study shows how systematically examining the effects of new mutations can enrich our understanding of evolutionary mechanisms. It also provides rare empirical evidence of selection acting on expression noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25778704      PMCID: PMC4455047          DOI: 10.1038/nature14244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  42 in total

1.  Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression.

Authors:  Jonathan M Raser; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Complex effects of nucleotide variants in a mammalian cis-regulatory element.

Authors:  Jamie C Kwasnieski; Ilaria Mogno; Connie A Myers; Joseph C Corbo; Barak A Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Differential expression of the three yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes.

Authors:  L McAlister; M J Holland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-12-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise.

Authors:  John R S Newman; Sina Ghaemmaghami; Jan Ihmels; David K Breslow; Matthew Noble; Joseph L DeRisi; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Grzegorz Kudla; Andrew W Murray; David Tollervey; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Saccharomyces diversity and evolution: a budding model genus.

Authors:  Chris Todd Hittinger
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  The UAS of the yeast GAPDH promoter consists of multiple general functional elements including RAP1 and GRF2 binding sites.

Authors:  S Yagi; K Yagi; J Fukuoka; M Suzuki
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.267

8.  Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise.

Authors:  Nizar N Batada; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers.

Authors:  Nicolás Frankel; Gregory K Davis; Diego Vargas; Shu Wang; François Payre; David L Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  flowClust: a Bioconductor package for automated gating of flow cytometry data.

Authors:  Kenneth Lo; Florian Hahne; Ryan R Brinkman; Raphael Gottardo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  68 in total

1.  Disentangling Sources of Selection on Exonic Transcriptional Enhancers.

Authors:  Rachel M Agoglia; Hunter B Fraser
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  The developmental genetics of biological robustness.

Authors:  Lamia Mestek Boukhibar; Michalis Barkoulas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Compensatory Drift and the Evolutionary Dynamics of Dosage-Sensitive Duplicate Genes.

Authors:  Ammon Thompson; Harold H Zakon; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A Burden of Rare Variants Associated with Extremes of Gene Expression in Human Peripheral Blood.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Idowu Akinsanmi; Dalia Arafat; T J Cradick; Ciaran M Lee; Samridhi Banskota; Urko M Marigorta; Gang Bao; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Molecular and evolutionary processes generating variation in gene expression.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Pétra Vande Zande; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Gene Expression Evolves under a House-of-Cards Model of Stabilizing Selection.

Authors:  Andrea Hodgins-Davis; Daniel P Rice; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Maintenance and Loss of Duplicated Genes by Dosage Subfunctionalization.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Gout; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Promoter shape varies across populations and affects promoter evolution and expression noise.

Authors:  Ignacio E Schor; Jacob F Degner; Dermot Harnett; Enrico Cannavò; Francesco P Casale; Heejung Shim; David A Garfield; Ewan Birney; Matthew Stephens; Oliver Stegle; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Epistasis and destabilizing mutations shape gene expression variability in humans via distinct modes of action.

Authors:  Ence Yang; Gang Wang; Jizhou Yang; Beiyan Zhou; Yanan Tian; James J Cai
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 10.  Next-generation analysis of gene expression regulation--comparing the roles of synthesis and degradation.

Authors:  Joel McManus; Zhe Cheng; Christine Vogel
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.