Literature DB >> 17660811

Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise.

Nizar N Batada1, Laurence D Hurst.   

Abstract

The distribution of genes on eukaryotic chromosomes is nonrandom, but the reasons behind this are not well understood. The commonly observed clustering of essential genes is a case in point. Here we model and test a new hypothesis. Essential proteins are unusual in that random fluctuations in abundance (noise) can be highly deleterious. We hypothesize that persistently open chromatin domains are sinks for essential genes, as they enable reduced noise by avoidance of transcriptional bursting associated with chromatin remodeling. Simulation of the model captures clustering and correctly predicts that (i) essential gene clusters are associated with low nucleosome occupancy (ii) noise-sensitive nonessential genes cluster with essential genes (iii) nonessential genes of similar knockout fitness are physically linked (iv) genes in domains rich in essential genes have low noise (v) essential genes are rare subtelomerically and (vi) essential gene clusters are preferentially conserved. We conclude that different noise characteristics of different genomic domains favors nonrandom gene positioning. This has implications for gene therapy and understanding transgenic phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17660811     DOI: 10.1038/ng2071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  104 in total

Review 1.  Error prevention and mitigation as forces in the evolution of genes and genomes.

Authors:  Tobias Warnecke; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  On a fundamental structure of gene networks in living cells.

Authors:  Nataly Kravchenko-Balasha; Alexander Levitzki; Andrew Goldstein; Varda Rotter; A Gross; F Remacle; R D Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Are sex-biased genes more dispensable?

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Transcription factories: gene expression in unions?

Authors:  Heidi Sutherland; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Did the modulation of expression noise shape the evolution of three dimensional genome organizations in eukaryotes?

Authors:  Kuljeet Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.197

6.  Physical linkage of metabolic genes in fungi is an adaptation against the accumulation of toxic intermediate compounds.

Authors:  Kriston L McGary; Jason C Slot; Antonis Rokas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A comparative genomics, network-based approach to understanding virulence in Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Jianying Gu; Yufeng Wang; Timothy Lilburn
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes.

Authors:  Itay Tirosh; Naama Barkai
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Retrotransposon-centered analysis of piRNA targeting shows a shift from active to passive retrotransposon transcription in developing mouse testes.

Authors:  Tobias Mourier
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences.

Authors:  Arjun Raj; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.