Literature DB >> 26292993

The developmental genetics of biological robustness.

Lamia Mestek Boukhibar1, Michalis Barkoulas2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Living organisms are continuously confronted with perturbations, such as environmental changes that include fluctuations in temperature and nutrient availability, or genetic changes such as mutations. While some developmental systems are affected by such challenges and display variation in phenotypic traits, others continue consistently to produce invariable phenotypes despite perturbation. This ability of a living system to maintain an invariable phenotype in the face of perturbations is termed developmental robustness. Biological robustness is a phenomenon observed across phyla, and studying its mechanisms is central to deciphering the genotype-phenotype relationship. Recent work in yeast, animals and plants has shown that robustness is genetically controlled and has started to reveal the underlying mechinisms behind it. SCOPE AND
CONCLUSIONS: Studying biological robustness involves focusing on an important property of developmental traits, which is the phenotypic distribution within a population. This is often neglected because the vast majority of developmental biology studies instead focus on population aggregates, such as trait averages. By drawing on findings in animals and yeast, this Viewpoint considers how studies on plant developmental robustness may benefit from strict definitions of what is the developmental system of choice and what is the relevant perturbation, and also from clear distinctions between gene effects on the trait mean and the trait variance. Recent advances in quantitative developmental biology and high-throughput phenotyping now allow the design of targeted genetic screens to identify genes that amplify or restrict developmental trait variance and to study how variation propagates across different phenotypic levels in biological systems. The molecular characterization of more quantitative trait loci affecting trait variance will provide further insights into the evolution of genes modulating developmental robustness. The study of robustness mechanisms in closely related species will address whether mechanisms of robustness are evolutionarily conserved.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental robustness; buffering.; canalization; cryptic genetic variation; genotype × phenotype; insensitivity; perturbation; plasticity; sensitivity; species diversity; variance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26292993      PMCID: PMC4845795          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  93 in total

Review 1.  Canalization of development by microRNAs.

Authors:  Eran Hornstein; Noam Shomron
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Genetic variation and quantitative trait loci associated with developmental stability and the environmental correlation between traits in maize.

Authors:  Bernardo Ordas; Rosa A Malvar; William G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare-cell survival in 'stress-sensitive' yeast populations.

Authors:  Amy L Bishop; Faiza A Rab; Edward R Sumner; Simon V Avery
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Quantitative variation in autocrine signaling and pathway crosstalk in the Caenorhabditis vulval network.

Authors:  Erika Hoyos; Kerry Kim; Josselin Milloz; Michalis Barkoulas; Jean-Baptiste Pénigault; Edwin Munro; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Dynamic and compensatory responses of Arabidopsis shoot and floral meristems to CLV3 signaling.

Authors:  Ralf Müller; Lorenzo Borghi; Dorota Kwiatkowska; Patrick Laufs; Rüdiger Simon
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Negative feedback confers mutational robustness in yeast transcription factor regulation.

Authors:  Charles M Denby; Joo Hyun Im; Richard C Yu; C Gustavo Pesce; Rachel B Brem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A Polycomb-based switch underlying quantitative epigenetic memory.

Authors:  Andrew Angel; Jie Song; Caroline Dean; Martin Howard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies.

Authors:  Wanneng Yang; Lingfeng Duan; Guoxing Chen; Lizhong Xiong; Qian Liu
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 7.834

9.  Inheritance beyond plain heritability: variance-controlling genes in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Xia Shen; Mats Pettersson; Lars Rönnegård; Örjan Carlborg
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A gene's ability to buffer variation is predicted by its fitness contribution and genetic interactions.

Authors:  Guang-Zhong Wang; Jian Liu; Wei Wang; Hong-Yu Zhang; Martin J Lercher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Base-Pairing Requirements for Small RNA-Mediated Gene Silencing of Recessive Self-Incompatibility Alleles in Arabidopsis halleri.

Authors:  Nicolas Burghgraeve; Samson Simon; Simon Barral; Isabelle Fobis-Loisy; Anne-Catherine Holl; Chloé Ponitzki; Eric Schmitt; Xavier Vekemans; Vincent Castric
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Gene expression profiling of epidermal cell types in C. elegans using Targeted DamID.

Authors:  Dimitris Katsanos; Mar Ferrando-Marco; Iqrah Razzaq; Gabriel Aughey; Tony D Southall; Michalis Barkoulas
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 6.862

3.  Commensal Gut Bacteria Buffer the Impact of Host Genetic Variants on Drosophila Developmental Traits under Nutritional Stress.

Authors:  Dali Ma; Maroun Bou-Sleiman; Pauline Joncour; Claire-Emmanuelle Indelicato; Michael Frochaux; Virginie Braman; Maria Litovchenko; Gilles Storelli; Bart Deplancke; François Leulier
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-08-02

4.  Large-effect flowering time mutations reveal conditionally adaptive paths through fitness landscapes in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Mark A Taylor; Amity M Wilczek; Judith L Roe; Stephen M Welch; Daniel E Runcie; Martha D Cooper; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reduction of Derlin activity suppresses Notch-dependent tumours in the C. elegans germ line.

Authors:  Ramya Singh; Ryan B Smit; Xin Wang; Chris Wang; Hilary Racher; Dave Hansen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  A Codon-Pair Bias Associated With Network Interactions in Influenza A, B, and C Genomes.

Authors:  Ewan P Plant; Zhiping Ye
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  The RNA helicase Ddx52 functions as a growth switch in juvenile zebrafish.

Authors:  Tzu-Lun Tseng; Ying-Ting Wang; Chang-Yu Tsao; Yi-Teng Ke; Yi-Ching Lee; Hwei-Jan Hsu; Kenneth D Poss; Chen-Hui Chen
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.862

8.  Control of primary metabolism by a virulence regulatory network promotes robustness in a plant pathogen.

Authors:  Rémi Peyraud; Ludovic Cottret; Lucas Marmiesse; Stéphane Genin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Chaperones, Canalization, and Evolution of Animal Forms.

Authors:  Atsuko Sato
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Stochastic loss and gain of symmetric divisions in the C. elegans epidermis perturbs robustness of stem cell number.

Authors:  Dimitris Katsanos; Sneha L Koneru; Lamia Mestek Boukhibar; Nicola Gritti; Ritobrata Ghose; Peter J Appleford; Maria Doitsidou; Alison Woollard; Jeroen S van Zon; Richard J Poole; Michalis Barkoulas
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.