Literature DB >> 16699522

Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise.

John R S Newman1, Sina Ghaemmaghami, Jan Ihmels, David K Breslow, Matthew Noble, Joseph L DeRisi, Jonathan S Weissman.   

Abstract

A major goal of biology is to provide a quantitative description of cellular behaviour. This task, however, has been hampered by the difficulty in measuring protein abundances and their variation. Here we present a strategy that pairs high-throughput flow cytometry and a library of GFP-tagged yeast strains to monitor rapidly and precisely protein levels at single-cell resolution. Bulk protein abundance measurements of >2,500 proteins in rich and minimal media provide a detailed view of the cellular response to these conditions, and capture many changes not observed by DNA microarray analyses. Our single-cell data argue that noise in protein expression is dominated by the stochastic production/destruction of messenger RNAs. Beyond this global trend, there are dramatic protein-specific differences in noise that are strongly correlated with a protein's mode of transcription and its function. For example, proteins that respond to environmental changes are noisy whereas those involved in protein synthesis are quiet. Thus, these studies reveal a remarkable structure to biological noise and suggest that protein noise levels have been selected to reflect the costs and potential benefits of this variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16699522     DOI: 10.1038/nature04785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  683 in total

1.  Label-free protein quantitation using weighted spectral counting.

Authors:  Christine Vogel; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  Heterogeneous expression of the virulence-related adhesin Epa1 between individual cells and strains of the pathogen Candida glabrata.

Authors:  Samantha C Halliwell; Matthew C A Smith; Philippa Muston; Sara L Holland; Simon V Avery
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2011-12-02

3.  Biotechnological properties of distillery and laboratory yeasts in response to industrial stresses.

Authors:  Fernanda Bravim; Fernando L Palhano; A Alberto R Fernandes; Patricia M B Fernandes
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Absolute quantification of the glycolytic pathway in yeast: deployment of a complete QconCAT approach.

Authors:  Kathleen M Carroll; Deborah M Simpson; Claire E Eyers; Christopher G Knight; Philip Brownridge; Warwick B Dunn; Catherine L Winder; Karin Lanthaler; Pinar Pir; Naglis Malys; Douglas B Kell; Stephen G Oliver; Simon J Gaskell; Robert J Beynon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  A genomic model of condition-specific nucleosome behavior explains transcriptional activity in yeast.

Authors:  Judith B Zaugg; Nicholas M Luscombe
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Combined gene expression and protein interaction analysis of dynamic modularity in glioma prognosis.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Hongbin Yang; Binsheng Gong; Chuanlu Jiang; Lizhuang Yang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  The unexpected traits associated with core promoter elements.

Authors:  Rivka Dikstein
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct

8.  Stochastic steady state gain in a gene expression process with mRNA degradation control.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kuwahara; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Reconciling molecular regulatory mechanisms with noise patterns of bacterial metabolic promoters in induced and repressed states.

Authors:  Matthew L Ferguson; Dominique Le Coq; Matthieu Jules; Stéphane Aymerich; Ovidiu Radulescu; Nathalie Declerck; Catherine A Royer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Error prevention and mitigation as forces in the evolution of genes and genomes.

Authors:  Tobias Warnecke; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.