Literature DB >> 25774063

Optimization of the Energy Window for PETbox4, a Preclinical PET Tomograph With a Small Inner Diameter.

Z Gu1, Q Bao1, R Taschereau1, H Wang1, B Bai2, A F Chatziioannou1.   

Abstract

Small animal positron emission tomography (PET) systems are often designed by employing close geometry configurations. Due to the different characteristics caused by geometrical factors, these tomographs require data acquisition protocols that differ from those optimized for conventional large diameter ring systems. In this work we optimized the energy window for data acquisitions with PETbox4, a 50 mm detector separation (box-like geometry) pre-clinical PET scanner, using the Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE). The fractions of different types of events were estimated using a voxelized phantom including a mouse as well as its supporting chamber, mimicking a realistic mouse imaging environment. Separate code was developed to extract additional information about the gamma interactions for more accurate event type classification. Three types of detector backscatter events were identified in addition to the trues, phantom scatters and randoms. The energy window was optimized based on the noise equivalent count rate (NECR) and scatter fraction (SF) with lower-level discriminators (LLD) corresponding to energies from 150 keV to 450 keV. The results were validated based on the calculated image uniformity, spillover ratio (SOR) and recovery coefficient (RC) from physical measurements using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU-4 image quality phantom. These results indicate that when PETbox4 is operated with a more narrow energy window (350-650 keV), detector backscatter rejection is unnecessary. For the NEMA NU-4 image quality phantom, the SOR for the water chamber decreases by about 45% from 15.1% to 8.3%, and the SOR for the air chamber decreases by 31% from 12.0% to 8.3% at the LLDs of 150 and 350 keV, without obvious change in uniformity, further supporting the simulation based optimization. The optimization described in this work is not limited to PETbox4, but also applicable or helpful to other small inner diameter geometry scanners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Backscatter; GATE; NECR; PET; PETbox4; SF; energy window; optimization

Year:  2014        PMID: 25774063      PMCID: PMC4356993          DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2014.2321326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  22 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging of small animals with dedicated PET tomographs.

Authors:  Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  The biological application of small animal PET imaging.

Authors:  R Myers
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.

Authors:  Carole Lartizien; Paul E Kinahan; Richard Swensson; Claude Comtat; Michael Lin; Victor Villemagne; Régine Trébossen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Performance evaluation of the microPET focus: a third-generation microPET scanner dedicated to animal imaging.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Ananya Ruangma; Douglas Rowland; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Patrick L Chow; Richard Laforest
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Purushottam A Dokhale; Robert W Silverman; Kanai S Shah; Mickel A McClish; Richard Farrell; Gerald Entine; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Impact of target-to-background ratio, target size, emission scan duration, and activity on physical figures of merit for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  M Brambilla; R Matheoud; C Secco; G Sacchetti; S Comi; M Rudoni; A Carriero; E Inglese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  DOI-based reconstruction algorithms for a compact breast PET scanner.

Authors:  Kyle M Champley; Lawrence R MacDonald; Thomas K Lewellen; Robert S Miyaoka; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Performance evaluation of PETbox: a low cost bench top preclinical PET scanner.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Qinan Bao; Nam T Vu; Robert W Silverman; Richard Taschereau; Brittany N Berry-Pusey; Ali Douraghy; Fernando R Rannou; David B Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  NEMA NU 4-2008 comparison of preclinical PET imaging systems.

Authors:  Andrew L Goertzen; Qinan Bao; Mélanie Bergeron; Eric Blankemeyer; Stephan Blinder; Mario Cañadas; Arion F Chatziioannou; Katherine Dinelle; Esmat Elhami; Hans-Sonke Jans; Eduardo Lage; Roger Lecomte; Vesna Sossi; Suleman Surti; Yuan-Chuan Tai; Juan José Vaquero; Esther Vicente; Darin A Williams; Richard Laforest
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preclinical positron emission tomography scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator: initial design study.

Authors:  Alexander V Stolin; Peter F Martone; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Raymond R Raylman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-05

2.  A DOI Detector With Crystal Scatter Identification Capability for High Sensitivity and High Spatial Resolution PET Imaging.

Authors:  Z Gu; D L Prout; R W Silverman; H Herman; A Dooraghi; A F Chatziioannou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.679

3.  Performance Evaluation of G8, a High-Sensitivity Benchtop Preclinical PET/CT Tomograph.

Authors:  Zheng Gu; Richard Taschereau; Nam T Vu; David L Prout; Robert W Silverman; Jason T Lee; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Evaluation of a BGO-Based PET System for Single-Cell Tracking Performance by Simulation and Phantom Studies.

Authors:  Yu Ouyang; Tae Jin Kim; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.488

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.