| Literature DB >> 25763393 |
N Ellissa Baskind1, Nicolas M Orsi2, Vinay Sharma1.
Abstract
Background. The natural cycle is the prototype to which we aspire to emulate in assisted reproduction techniques. Increasing evidence is emerging that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with exogenous gonadotropins may be detrimental to oogenesis, embryo quality, and endometrial receptivity. This research aimed at assessing the impact of COH on the intrafollicular milieu by comparing follicular fluid (FF) cytokine profiles during stimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) and modified natural cycle (MNC) IVF. Methods. Ten women undergoing COH IVF and 10 matched women undergoing MNC IVF were recruited for this pilot study. 40 FF cytokine concentrations from individual follicles and plasma were measured by fluid-phase multiplex immunoassay. Demographic/cycle/cytokine data were compared and correlations between cytokines were computed. Results. No significant differences were found between COH and MNC groups for patient and cycle demographics, including outcome. Overall mean FF cytokine levels were higher in the MNC group for 29/40 cytokines, significantly so for leukaemia inhibitory factor and stromal cell-derived factor-1α. Furthermore, FF MNC cytokine correlations were significantly stronger than for COH data. Conclusions. These findings suggest that COH perturbs intrafollicular cytokine networks, in terms of both cytokine levels and their interrelationships. This may impact oocyte maturation/fertilization and embryo developmental competence.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25763393 PMCID: PMC4334052 DOI: 10.1155/2014/218769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Reprod Med ISSN: 2314-5757
Participant and cycle demographics in MNC and COH cycles.
| NC Cycle | COH Cycle |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30.8 ± 0.72 (27–34) | 31.9 ± 1.20 (24–35) | 0.21 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.5 ± 0.86 (20.0–28.0) | 24.0 ± 0.87 (20.0–30.0) | 0.88 |
| Baseline FSH (IU/L) | 5.2 ± 0.40 (4.0–8.0) | 6.0 ± 0.45 (3.9–7.9) | 0.24 |
| Baseline LH (IU/L) | 5.2 ± 0.48 (2.6–7.1) | 4.6 ± 0.55 (1.5–7.4) | 0.44 |
| Baseline E2 (pmol/L) | 115.2 ± 12.23 (73–162) | 117.8 ± 18.14 (25–193) | 0.92 |
| Day of cycle for aspiration | 14 ± 0.93 (10–20) | 13.1 ± 0.34 (12–15) | 0.35 |
| Follicular volume (mL) | 2.3 ± 0.40 (0.5–4.0) | 3.0 ± 0.51 (1.0–6.5) | 0.62 |
| Mature oocyte (%) | 70a | 100b | 0.06 |
| Clinical pregnancy (%) | 20c | 30c | 0.61 |
Mean ± SEM (range), unless otherwise specified. aOne patient spontaneously ovulated, therefore 9 oocytes were retrieved; bFollicles yielding a mature oocyte which was subsequently transferred as an embryo were included in this cohort; cClinical pregnancy rate calculated per embryos transferred [MNC: 7 embryos transferred; COH; 10 embryos transferred].
Figure 1Mean (± SEM) FF cytokine concentrations in MNC (n = 9) and COH (n = 10) cycles (*significant difference from COH cycle; P < 0.05).
Figure 2Mean (± SEM) plasma cytokine concentrations in MNC (n = 9) and COH (n = 10) cycles (*significant difference from COH cycle; P < 0.05).
Figure 3Heat maps demonstrating correlations between cytokines in periovulatory FF in MNC and COH cycles. Each square represents the correlation between specific cytokines: a red square represents a significantly positive correlation whilst a blue square represents a significantly negative correlation. A black square represents no significant relationship and the darker shades of red and blue represent weaker positive and negative correlations, respectively.