Literature DB >> 23623475

Utilization and success rates of unstimulated in vitro fertilization in the United States: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database.

John David Gordon1, Michael DiMattina, Andrea Reh, Awie Botes, Gerard Celia, Mark Payson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the utilization and outcomes of natural cycle (unstimulated) IVF as reported to the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in 2006 and 2007.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: Dataset analysis from the SART Clinical Outcome Reporting System national database. PATIENT(S): All patients undergoing IVF as reported to SART in 2006 and 2007. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Utilization of unstimulated IVF; description of patient demographics; and comparison of implantation and pregnancy rates between unstimulated and stimulated IVF cycles. RESULT(S): During 2006 and 2007 a total of 795 unstimulated IVF cycles were initiated. Success rates were age dependent, with patients <35 years of age demonstrating clinical pregnancy rates per cycle start, retrieval, and transfer of 19.2%, 26.8%, and 35.9%, respectively. Implantation rates were statistically higher for unstimulated compared with stimulated IVF in patients who were 35 to 42 years old. CONCLUSION(S): Unstimulated IVF represents <1% of the total IVF cycles initiated in the United States. The pregnancy and live birth rates per initiated cycle were 19.2% and 15.2%, respectively, in patients <35 years old. The implantation rates in unstimulated IVF cycles compared favorably to stimulated IVF. Natural cycle IVF may be considered in a wide range of patients as an alternative therapy for the infertile couple.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; Natural cycle IVF; unstimulated IVF

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23623475     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Natural cycle IVF reduces the risk of low birthweight infants compared with conventional stimulated IVF.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Laxmi A Kondapalli; Gerard Celia; John Gordon; Michael DiMattina; Mark Payson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Outcomes of 1503 cycles of modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Talya Shaulov; Maria P Vélez; Karen Buzaglo; Simon J Phillips; Isaac Jacques Kadoch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Activin Decoy Receptor ActRIIB:Fc Lowers FSH and Therapeutically Restores Oocyte Yield, Prevents Oocyte Chromosome Misalignments and Spindle Aberrations, and Increases Fertility in Midlife Female SAMP8 Mice.

Authors:  Lori R Bernstein; Amelia C L Mackenzie; Se-Jin Lee; Charles L Chaffin; István Merchenthaler
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Case-based discussion on the implications of exogenous estrogens in hemostasis and thrombosis: the obstetrician's view.

Authors:  Andra H James
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

5.  Preliminary proteomic analysis on the alterations in follicular fluid proteins from women undergoing natural cycles or controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Yan-Ting Wu; Yan Wu; Jun-Yu Zhang; Ning-Ning Hou; Ai-Xia Liu; Jie-Xue Pan; Jie-Yang Lu; Jian-Zhong Sheng; He-Feng Huang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Anti-Müllerian hormone and progesterone levels produced by granulosa cells are higher when derived from natural cycle IVF than from conventional gonadotropin-stimulated IVF.

Authors:  Zahraa Kollmann; Nick A Bersinger; Brett D McKinnon; Sophie Schneider; Michael D Mueller; Michael von Wolff
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  A J Bensdorp; R I Tjon-Kon-Fat; P M M Bossuyt; C A M Koks; G J E Oosterhuis; A Hoek; P G A Hompes; F J M Broekmans; H R Verhoeve; J P de Bruin; R van Golde; S Repping; B J Cohlen; M D A Lambers; P F van Bommel; E Slappendel; D Perquin; J M Smeenk; M J Pelinck; J Gianotten; D A Hoozemans; J W M Maas; M J C Eijkemans; F van der Veen; B W J Mol; M van Wely
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-09

8.  Reproductive outcomes of vitrified blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle versus mild hormonally stimulated and artificial protocols: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Otoufe Sheikhi; Masoumeh Golsorkhtabaramiri; Sedighe Esmaeilzadeh; Treza Mahouti; Fateme Nadi Heidari
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01

9.  Effects of intramuscular and vaginal progesterone supplementation on frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Zhuo-Ye Luo; Gui-Min Hao; Bu-Lang Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Impact of exogenous gonadotropin stimulation on circulatory and follicular fluid cytokine profiles.

Authors:  N Ellissa Baskind; Nicolas M Orsi; Vinay Sharma
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-11-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.