Literature DB >> 18793777

Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles.

Mauro Schimberni1, Francesco Morgia, Julio Colabianchi, Annalise Giallonardo, Claudio Piscitelli, Pierluigi Giannini, Monica Montigiani, Marco Sbracia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of the natural cycle for in vitro fertilization (IVF) in poor responder patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective survey.
SETTING: Private center for assisted reproduction. PATIENT(S): 294 women who were poor responders in a previous IVF cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Analysis of 500 consecutive natural cycles IVF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of cycles with oocytes, pregnancy rate per cycle, per transfer, and implantation rate. RESULT(S): Oocytes were found in 391 cases (78.1%), and cleaving embryos suitable for transfer were obtained in 285 cycles (57.0%). Pregnancy was observed in 49 cases, with a pregnancy rate of 9.8% per cycle, 17.1% per transfer, and 16.7% per patient. The patients were subdivided arbitrarily by the women's age into three groups. Patients 35 years old or younger showed a pregnancy rate of 18.1% per cycle, 29.2% per transfer, and 31.7% per patient. Women aged between 36 and 39 years showed a pregnancy rate of 11.7% per cycle, 20.6% per transfer, and 20.3% per patient. Women 40 years old or older showed a pregnancy rate of 5.8% per cycle, 10.5% per transfer, and 9.7% per patient. No differences were found for any of the evaluated parameters, independent of which cycle was the first, the second, third, fourth, or fifth, or further consecutive cycle. CONCLUSION(S): In poor responder patients, natural-cycle IVF is an effective treatment, especially in younger women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18793777     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  24 in total

1.  Accumulation of oocytes from a few modified natural cycles to improve IVF results: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Cristiana Arrivi; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Daniela Zavaglia; Cecilia Mencacci; Maria Giulia Minasi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Outcomes of 1503 cycles of modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Talya Shaulov; Maria P Vélez; Karen Buzaglo; Simon J Phillips; Isaac Jacques Kadoch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Meta-analysis of GnRH-antagonists versus GnRH-agonists in poor responder protocols.

Authors:  Myrto Papamentzelopoulou; Sofoklis Stavros; Despoina Mavrogianni; Christos Kalantzis; Dimitrios Loutradis; Petros Drakakis
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Outcome of gestational surrogacy according to IVF protocol.

Authors:  Ronit Machtinger; Nir-Ram Duvdevani; Oshrit Lebovitz; Jehoshua Dor; Ariel Hourvitz; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  IVF Lite: Is this the Future of Assisted Reproduction?

Authors:  G N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-03

6.  Natural cycle IVF/IVM may be more desirable for poor responder patients after failure of stimulated cycles.

Authors:  Jianhua Li; Ye Xu; Guoping Zhou; Junhong Guo; Nan Xin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Moderate ovarian stimulation does not increase the incidence of human embryo chromosomal abnormalities in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Elena Labarta; Ernesto Bosch; Pilar Alamá; Carmen Rubio; Lorena Rodrigo; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.

Authors:  Sfakianoudis Konstantinos; Tsioulou Petroula; Maziotis Evangelos; Giannelou Polina; Glava Argyro; Grigoriadis Sokratis; Rapani Anna; Nezos Andrianos; Pantou Agni; Koutsilieris Michael; Pantos Konstantinos; Mastorakos George; Simopoulou Mara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Fertility and age.

Authors:  Korula George; Mohan S Kamath
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-09

10.  Does the number of oocytes retrieved influence pregnancy after fresh embryo transfer?

Authors:  Qianfang Cai; Fei Wan; Kai Huang; Hanwang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.