Literature DB >> 20858698

Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: 10 years later.

Bart C J M Fauser1, Geeta Nargund, Anders Nyboe Andersen, Robert Norman, Basil Tarlatzis, Jacky Boivin, William Ledger.   

Abstract

Ovarian stimulation to achieve multiple follicle development has been an integral part of IVF treatment. In the context of improved laboratory performance, the need for a large number of oocytes as an integral part of a successful IVF programme may be questioned. The aim of the current debate is to summarize the studies performed during the last decade to develop the concept of mild stimulation aiming to obtain fewer than eight oocytes. Here we examine the balance between IVF success and patient discomfort, and complications and cost, and how these might improve by simpler ovarian stimulation protocols aimed at retrieving fewer oocytes. We intend to analyse why progress has been rather slow and why there is much resistance to mild stimulation. Finally, presumed useful directions for future research will be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20858698     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  26 in total

1.  Why more is less and less is more when it comes to ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Zeev Blumenfeld
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Efficacy and safety of late-start Corifollitropin-alfa administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a cohort, case-control study.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Giulia Pittatore; Simona Casano; Stefano Canosa; Francesca Evangelista; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Charalampos Siristatidis; George Salamalekis; Konstantinos Dafopoulos; George Basios; Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Nikolaos Papantoniou
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Mild ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: one perspective from the USA.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Avoiding OHSS: Controlled Ovarian Low-Dose Stimulation in Women with PCOS.

Authors:  D Fischer; C Reisenbüchler; S Rösner; J Haussmann; P Wimberger; M Goeckenjan
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Sequential clomiphene/corifollitrophin alpha as a technique for mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Deirdre Zander-Fox; Michelle Lane; Hamish Hamilton; Kelton Tremellen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  MILD ovarian stimulation with GnRH-antagonist vs. long protocol with low dose FSH for non-PCO high responders undergoing IVF: a prospective, randomized study including thawing cycles.

Authors:  Simona Casano; Daniela Guidetti; Ambra Patriarca; Giulia Pittatore; Gianluca Gennarelli; Alberto Revelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur; Deepika Krishna; Nivedita Shetty; Sandhya Krishnan; Ms Srinivas; Kamini Arvind Rao
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-05

9.  A comparison of the use of clomiphene citrate and letrozole in patients undergoing IVF with the objective of producing only one or two embryos.

Authors:  B I Rose; D C Laky; S D Rose
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015

10.  Factors Affecting Artificial Insemination Pregnancy Outcome.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Yue Zhang; Hong-Liang Sun; Li-Ting Wang; Xue-Feng Li; Fei Wang; Yan-Lin Wang; Qing-Chun Li
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.