Literature DB >> 25762720

Phosphorylation of Sae2 Mediates Forkhead-associated (FHA) Domain-specific Interaction and Regulates Its DNA Repair Function.

Jason Liang1, Raymond T Suhandynata2, Huilin Zhou3.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 and its ortholog CtIP in higher eukaryotes have a conserved role in the initial processing of DNA lesions and influencing their subsequent repair pathways. Sae2 is phosphorylated by the ATR/ATM family kinases Mec1 and Tel1 in response to DNA damage. Among the Mec1/Tel1 consensus phosphorylation sites of Sae2, we found that mutations of Thr-90 and Thr-279 of Sae2 into alanine caused a persistent Rad53 activation in response to a transient DNA damage, similar to the loss of Sae2. To gain insight into the function of this phosphorylation of Sae2, we performed a quantitative proteomics analysis to identify its associated proteins. We found that phosphorylation of Thr-90 of Sae2 mediates its interaction with Rad53, Dun1, Xrs2, Dma1, and Dma2, whereas Rad53 and Dun1 additionally interact with phosphorylated Thr-279 of Sae2. Mutations of the ligand-binding residues of Forkhead-associated (FHA) domains of Rad53, Dun1, Xrs2, Dma1, and Dma2 abolished their interactions with Sae2, revealing the involvement of FHA-specific interactions. Mutations of Thr-90 and Thr-279 of Sae2 caused a synergistic defect when combined with sgs1Δ and exo1Δ and elevated gross chromosomal rearrangements. Likewise, mutations of RAD53 and DUN1 caused a synthetic growth defect with sgs1Δ and elevated gross chromosomal rearrangements. These findings suggest that threonine-specific phosphorylation of Sae2 by Mec1 and Tel1 contributes to DNA repair and genome maintenance via its interactions with Rad53 and Dun1.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checkpoint Control; DNA Damage Response; DNA Repair; Dun1; FHA Domains; Protein Phosphorylation; Protein-Protein Interaction; Rad53; Sae2; Xrs2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25762720      PMCID: PMC4409241          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.625293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  44 in total

1.  Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants.

Authors:  A H Tong; M Evangelista; A B Parsons; H Xu; G D Bader; N Pagé; M Robinson; S Raghibizadeh; C W Hogue; H Bussey; B Andrews; M Tyers; C Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes.

Authors:  Lee Zou; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Recombination and the Tel1 and Mec1 checkpoints differentially effect genome rearrangements driven by telomere dysfunction in yeast.

Authors:  Vincent Pennaneach; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-05-09       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Regulation of genome stability by TEL1 and MEC1, yeast homologs of the mammalian ATM and ATR genes.

Authors:  Rolf J Craven; Patricia W Greenwell; Margaret Dominska; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Yeast Tdp1 and Rad1-Rad10 function as redundant pathways for repairing Top1 replicative damage.

Authors:  John R Vance; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase.

Authors:  Vladimir I Bashkirov; Elena V Bashkirova; Edwin Haghnazari; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics.

Authors:  Shao-En Ong; Blagoy Blagoev; Irina Kratchmarova; Dan Bach Kristensen; Hanno Steen; Akhilesh Pandey; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation.

Authors:  Enrico Baroni; Valeria Viscardi; Hugo Cartagena-Lirola; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakada; Kunihiro Matsumoto; Katsunori Sugimoto
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas; Felipe Cortés-Ledesma; Alessandro A Sartori; Andrés Aguilera; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  17 in total

1.  Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection.

Authors:  Tai-Yuan Yu; Michael T Kimble; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Uncoupling Sae2 Functions in Downregulation of Tel1 and Rad53 Signaling Activities.

Authors:  Chiara Vittoria Colombo; Luca Menin; Riccardo Ranieri; Diego Bonetti; Michela Clerici; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  NBS1 promotes the endonuclease activity of the MRE11-RAD50 complex by sensing CtIP phosphorylation.

Authors:  Roopesh Anand; Arti Jasrotia; Diana Bundschuh; Sean Michael Howard; Lepakshi Ranjha; Manuel Stucki; Petr Cejka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  CtIP/Ctp1/Sae2, molecular form fit for function.

Authors:  Sara N Andres; R Scott Williams
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

5.  Xrs2 Dependent and Independent Functions of the Mre11-Rad50 Complex.

Authors:  Julyun Oh; Amr Al-Zain; Elda Cannavo; Petr Cejka; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 6.  DNA damage kinase signaling: checkpoint and repair at 30 years.

Authors:  Michael Charles Lanz; Diego Dibitetto; Marcus Bustamante Smolka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Genetic and biochemical evidences reveal novel insights into the mechanism underlying Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2-mediated abrogation of DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Indrajeet Ghodke; K Muniyappa
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 8.  Mechanism and regulation of DNA end resection in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 9.  DNA End Resection: Nucleases Team Up with the Right Partners to Initiate Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  Petr Cejka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Enhancement of BLM-DNA2-Mediated Long-Range DNA End Resection by CtIP.

Authors:  James M Daley; Judit Jimenez-Sainz; Weibin Wang; Adam S Miller; Xiaoyu Xue; Kevin A Nguyen; Ryan B Jensen; Patrick Sung
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.