Literature DB >> 30787182

NBS1 promotes the endonuclease activity of the MRE11-RAD50 complex by sensing CtIP phosphorylation.

Roopesh Anand1, Arti Jasrotia2, Diana Bundschuh2, Sean Michael Howard1, Lepakshi Ranjha1, Manuel Stucki2, Petr Cejka3,4.   

Abstract

DNA end resection initiates DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 and phosphorylated CtIP perform the first resection step via MRE11-catalyzed endonucleolytic DNA cleavage. Human NBS1, more than its homologue Xrs2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is crucial for this process, highlighting complex mechanisms that regulate the MRE11 nuclease in higher eukaryotes. Using a reconstituted system, we show here that NBS1, through its FHA and BRCT domains, functions as a sensor of CtIP phosphorylation. NBS1 then activates the MRE11-RAD50 nuclease through direct physical interactions with MRE11. In the absence of NBS1, MRE11-RAD50 exhibits a weaker nuclease activity, which requires CtIP but not strictly its phosphorylation. This identifies at least two mechanisms by which CtIP augments MRE11: a phosphorylation-dependent mode through NBS1 and a phosphorylation-independent mode without NBS1. In support, we show that limited DNA end resection occurs in vivo in the absence of the FHA and BRCT domains of NBS1. Collectively, our data suggest that NBS1 restricts the MRE11-RAD50 nuclease to S-G2 phase when CtIP is extensively phosphorylated. This defines mechanisms that regulate the MRE11 nuclease in DNA metabolism.
© 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA end resection; DNA repair; homologous recombination; nuclease; phosphorylation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30787182      PMCID: PMC6443204          DOI: 10.15252/embj.2018101005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  80 in total

1.  ATM regulates Mre11-dependent DNA end-degradation and microhomology-mediated end joining.

Authors:  Elias A Rahal; Leigh A Henricksen; Yuling Li; R Scott Williams; John A Tainer; Kathleen Dixon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint control requires CtIP, a phosphorylation-dependent binding partner of BRCA1 C-terminal domains.

Authors:  Xiaochun Yu; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex.

Authors:  T Usui; H Ogawa; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response.

Authors:  J P Carney; R S Maser; H Olivares; E M Davis; M Le Beau; J R Yates; L Hays; W F Morgan; J H Petrini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mlh1-Mlh3 heterodimer is an endonuclease that preferentially binds to Holliday junctions.

Authors:  Lepakshi Ranjha; Roopesh Anand; Petr Cejka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Main steps in DNA double-strand break repair: an introduction to homologous recombination and related processes.

Authors:  Lepakshi Ranjha; Sean M Howard; Petr Cejka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences.

Authors:  Jeremy M Stark; Andrew J Pierce; Jin Oh; Albert Pastink; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Effect of amino acid substitutions in the rad50 ATP binding domain on DNA double strand break repair in yeast.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Kelly M Trujillo; Stephen Van Komen; Dong Hyun Roh; Lumir Krejci; L Kevin Lewis; Michael A Resnick; Patrick Sung; Alan E Tomkinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.

Authors:  Sofija Mijic; Ralph Zellweger; Nagaraja Chappidi; Matteo Berti; Kurt Jacobs; Karun Mutreja; Sebastian Ursich; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Andre Nussenzweig; Pavel Janscak; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Regulatory control of DNA end resection by Sae2 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Elda Cannavo; Dominic Johnson; Sara N Andres; Vera M Kissling; Julia K Reinert; Valerie Garcia; Dorothy A Erie; Daniel Hess; Nicolas H Thomä; Radoslav I Enchev; Matthias Peter; R Scott Williams; Matt J Neale; Petr Cejka
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  23 in total

1.  A conserved Ctp1/CtIP C-terminal peptide stimulates Mre11 endonuclease activity.

Authors:  Aleksandar Zdravković; James M Daley; Arijit Dutta; Tatsuya Niwa; Yasuto Murayama; Shuji Kanamaru; Kentaro Ito; Takahisa Maki; Bilge Argunhan; Masayuki Takahashi; Hideo Tsubouchi; Patrick Sung; Hiroshi Iwasaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  DNA end resection during homologous recombination.

Authors:  Robert Gnügge; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  CtIP suppresses primary microRNA maturation and promotes metastasis of colon cancer cells in a xenograft mouse model.

Authors:  Jianping Ren; Yan Wu; Ya Wang; Yuqin Zhao; Youhang Li; Shuailin Hao; Lixiu Lin; Shuyuan Zhang; Xingzhi Xu; Hailong Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Moving Mountains-The BRCA1 Promotion of DNA Resection.

Authors:  Ruth M Densham; Joanna R Morris
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2019-09-03

5.  CTCF cooperates with CtIP to drive homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Soon Young Hwang; Mi Ae Kang; Chul Joon Baik; Yejin Lee; Ngo Thanh Hang; Byung-Gyu Kim; Joo Seok Han; Jae-Hoon Jeong; Daechan Park; Kyungjae Myung; Jong-Soo Lee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Topoisomerase II contributes to DNA secondary structure-mediated double-stranded breaks.

Authors:  Karol Szlachta; Arkadi Manukyan; Heather M Raimer; Sandeep Singh; Anita Salamon; Wenying Guo; Kirill S Lobachev; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 19.160

Review 7.  Functional and structural insights into the MRX/MRN complex, a key player in recognition and repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Renata Tisi; Jacopo Vertemara; Giuseppe Zampella; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  UBC13-Mediated Ubiquitin Signaling Promotes Removal of Blocking Adducts from DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Remi Akagawa; Hai Thanh Trinh; Liton Kumar Saha; Masataka Tsuda; Kouji Hirota; Shintaro Yamada; Atsushi Shibata; Masato T Kanemaki; Shinichiro Nakada; Shunichi Takeda; Hiroyuki Sasanuma
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-03-31

Review 9.  Type II DNA Topoisomerases Cause Spontaneous Double-Strand Breaks in Genomic DNA.

Authors:  Suguru Morimoto; Masataka Tsuda; Heeyoun Bunch; Hiroyuki Sasanuma; Caroline Austin; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Protein phosphatase 1 acts as a RIF1 effector to suppress DSB resection prior to Shieldin action.

Authors:  Shin-Ya Isobe; Shin-Ichiro Hiraga; Koji Nagao; Hiroyuki Sasanuma; Anne D Donaldson; Chikashi Obuse
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.