Literature DB >> 18716619

CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination.

Pablo Huertas1, Felipe Cortés-Ledesma, Alessandro A Sartori, Andrés Aguilera, Stephen P Jackson.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by two principal mechanisms: non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). HR is the most accurate DSB repair mechanism but is generally restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, when DNA has been replicated and a sister chromatid is available as a repair template. By contrast, NHEJ operates throughout the cell cycle but assumes most importance in G1 (refs 4, 6). The choice between repair pathways is governed by cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs), with a major site of control being at the level of DSB resection, an event that is necessary for HR but not NHEJ, and which takes place most effectively in S and G2 (refs 2, 5). Here we establish that cell-cycle control of DSB resection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results from the phosphorylation by CDK of an evolutionarily conserved motif in the Sae2 protein. We show that mutating Ser 267 of Sae2 to a non-phosphorylatable residue causes phenotypes comparable to those of a sae2Delta null mutant, including hypersensitivity to camptothecin, defective sporulation, reduced hairpin-induced recombination, severely impaired DNA-end processing and faulty assembly and disassembly of HR factors. Furthermore, a Sae2 mutation that mimics constitutive Ser 267 phosphorylation complements these phenotypes and overcomes the necessity of CDK activity for DSB resection. The Sae2 mutations also cause cell-cycle-stage specific hypersensitivity to DNA damage and affect the balance between HR and NHEJ. These findings therefore provide a mechanistic basis for cell-cycle control of DSB repair and highlight the importance of regulating DSB resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716619      PMCID: PMC2635538          DOI: 10.1038/nature07215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  31 in total

1.  Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III.

Authors:  Thomas Caspari; Johanne M Murray; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lisby; Jacqueline H Barlow; Rebecca C Burgess; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S Prinz; A Amon; F Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2.

Authors:  A H McKee; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  S J Boulton; S P Jackson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Cyclin-binding motifs are essential for the function of p21CIP1.

Authors:  J Chen; P Saha; S Kornbluth; B D Dynlacht; A Dutta
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  DSB repair: the yeast paradigm.

Authors:  Yael Aylon; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

Review 8.  Regulation of Cdc28 cyclin-dependent protein kinase activity during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M D Mendenhall; A E Hodge
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Enhancement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae end-joining efficiency by cell growth stage but not by impairment of recombination.

Authors:  Elissa Karathanasis; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1.

Authors:  Grzegorz Ira; Achille Pellicioli; Alitukiriza Balijja; Xuan Wang; Simona Fiorani; Walter Carotenuto; Giordano Liberi; Debra Bressan; Lihong Wan; Nancy M Hollingsworth; James E Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  253 in total

1.  Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection.

Authors:  Tai-Yuan Yu; Michael T Kimble; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Exo1 plays a major role in DNA end resection in humans and influences double-strand break repair and damage signaling decisions.

Authors:  Nozomi Tomimatsu; Bipasha Mukherjee; Katherine Deland; Akihiro Kurimasa; Emma Bolderson; Kum Kum Khanna; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-02-11

Review 3.  Mechanisms and regulation of DNA end resection.

Authors:  Maria Pia Longhese; Diego Bonetti; Nicola Manfrini; Michela Clerici
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Telomere capping in non-dividing yeast cells requires Yku and Rap1.

Authors:  Momchil D Vodenicharov; Nancy Laterreur; Raymund J Wellinger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2.

Authors:  Eleni P Mimitou; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Cyclin D1 promotes BRCA2-Rad51 interaction by restricting cyclin A/B-dependent BRCA2 phosphorylation.

Authors:  C Chalermrujinanant; W Michowski; G Sittithumcharee; F Esashi; S Jirawatnotai
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm.

Authors:  Marcos Malumbres; Mariano Barbacid
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Phosphorylation of Sae2 Mediates Forkhead-associated (FHA) Domain-specific Interaction and Regulates Its DNA Repair Function.

Authors:  Jason Liang; Raymond T Suhandynata; Huilin Zhou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Constitutively active Artemis nuclease recognizes structures containing single-stranded DNA configurations.

Authors:  Nicholas R Pannunzio; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-26

10.  Cdk1-dependent regulation of the Mre11 complex couples DNA repair pathways to cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Antoine Simoneau; Xavier Robellet; Anne-Marie Ladouceur; Damien D'Amours
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.