Literature DB >> 30510002

Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection.

Tai-Yuan Yu1, Michael T Kimble1,2, Lorraine S Symington3,2.   

Abstract

The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2NBS1 complex plays important roles in the DNA damage response by activating the Tel1ATM kinase and catalyzing 5'-3' resection at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To initiate resection, Mre11 endonuclease nicks the 5' strands at DSB ends in a reaction stimulated by Sae2CtIP Accordingly, Mre11-nuclease deficient (mre11-nd) and sae2Δ mutants are expected to exhibit similar phenotypes; however, we found several notable differences. First, sae2Δ cells exhibit greater sensitivity to genotoxins than mre11-nd cells. Second, sae2Δ is synthetic lethal with sgs1Δ, whereas the mre11-nd sgs1Δ mutant is viable. Third, Sae2 attenuates the Tel1-Rad53CHK2 checkpoint and antagonizes Rad953BP1 accumulation at DSBs independent of Mre11 nuclease. We show that Sae2 competes with other Tel1 substrates, thus reducing Rad9 binding to chromatin and to Rad53. We suggest that persistent Sae2 binding at DSBs in the mre11-nd mutant counteracts the inhibitory effects of Rad9 and Rad53 on Exo1 and Dna2-Sgs1-mediated resection, accounting for the different phenotypes conferred by mre11-nd and sae2Δ mutations. Collectively, these data show a resection initiation independent role for Sae2 at DSBs by modulating the DNA damage checkpoint.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage checkpoint; DNA repair; Mre11; Rad9; Sae2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30510002      PMCID: PMC6304958          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1816539115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  77 in total

Review 1.  Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination.

Authors:  Joseph San Filippo; Patrick Sung; Hannah Klein
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  Interplays between ATM/Tel1 and ATR/Mec1 in sensing and signaling DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Elisa Gobbini; Daniele Cesena; Alessandro Galbiati; Arianna Lockhart; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-08-13

3.  Sae2 promotes DNA damage resistance by removing the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex from DNA and attenuating Rad53 signaling.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Roberto A Donnianni; Naofumi Handa; Sarah K Deng; Julyun Oh; Leonid A Timashev; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9.

Authors:  Robert Wysocki; Ali Javaheri; Stéphane Allard; Fei Sha; Jacques Côté; Stephen J Kron
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Functional interplay of the Mre11 nuclease and Ku in the response to replication-associated DNA damage.

Authors:  Steven S Foster; Alessia Balestrini; John H J Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 methylation are required for a novel Rad9 DSB repair function following checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Geraldine W-L Toh; Aisling M O'Shaughnessy; Sonia Jimeno; Ian M Dobbie; Muriel Grenon; Stefano Maffini; Anne O'Rorke; Noel F Lowndes
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-05-02

7.  Alteration of telomeric sequences and senescence caused by mutations in RAD50 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K M Kironmai; K Muniyappa
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast.

Authors:  Toru M Nakamura; Li-Lin Du; Christophe Redon; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Association of Rad9 with double-strand breaks through a Mec1-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Takahiro Naiki; Tatsushi Wakayama; Daisuke Nakada; Kunihiro Matsumoto; Katsunori Sugimoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection.

Authors:  Thomas Costelloe; Raphaël Louge; Nozomi Tomimatsu; Bipasha Mukherjee; Emmanuelle Martini; Basheer Khadaroo; Kenny Dubois; Wouter W Wiegant; Agnès Thierry; Sandeep Burma; Haico van Attikum; Bertrand Llorente
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  16 in total

1.  The Srs2 helicase dampens DNA damage checkpoint by recycling RPA from chromatin.

Authors:  Nalini Dhingra; Sahiti Kuppa; Lei Wei; Nilisha Pokhrel; Silva Baburyan; Xiangzhou Meng; Edwin Antony; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sir3 heterochromatin protein promotes non-homologous end joining by direct inhibition of Sae2.

Authors:  Hélène Bordelet; Rafaël Costa; Clémentine Brocas; Jordane Dépagne; Xavier Veaute; Didier Busso; Amandine Batté; Raphaël Guérois; Stéphane Marcand; Karine Dubrana
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  CtIP-mediated DNA resection is dispensable for IgH class switch recombination by alternative end-joining.

Authors:  Xiaobin S Wang; Junfei Zhao; Foon Wu-Baer; Zhengping Shao; Brian J Lee; Olivia M Cupo; Raul Rabadan; Jean Gautier; Richard Baer; Shan Zha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  David P Waterman; James E Haber; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 5.  DNA end resection during homologous recombination.

Authors:  Robert Gnügge; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Mechanism of MRX inhibition by Rif2 at telomeres.

Authors:  Florian Roisné-Hamelin; Sabrina Pobiega; Kévin Jézéquel; Simona Miron; Jordane Dépagne; Xavier Veaute; Didier Busso; Marie-Hélène Le Du; Isabelle Callebaut; Jean-Baptiste Charbonnier; Philippe Cuniasse; Sophie Zinn-Justin; Stéphane Marcand
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of CtIP at a conserved ATM/ATR site T855 promotes lymphomagenesis in mice.

Authors:  Xiaobin S Wang; Demis Menolfi; Foon Wu-Baer; Marco Fangazio; Stefanie N Meyer; Zhengping Shao; Yunyue Wang; Yimeng Zhu; Brian J Lee; Verna M Estes; Olivia M Cupo; Jean Gautier; Laura Pasqualucci; Riccardo Dalla-Favera; Richard Baer; Shan Zha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Rad9/53BP1 promotes DNA repair via crossover recombination by limiting the Sgs1 and Mph1 helicases.

Authors:  Matteo Ferrari; Chetan C Rawal; Samuele Lodovichi; Maria Y Vietri; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Role of the Mre11 Complex in Preserving Genome Integrity.

Authors:  Julyun Oh; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  The Replisome Mediates A-NHEJ Repair of Telomeres Lacking POT1-TPP1 Independently of MRN Function.

Authors:  Rekha Rai; Peili Gu; Cayla Broton; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Yong Chen; Sandy Chang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 9.995

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.