Literature DB >> 29032420

Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.

Domenico Cuda1, Alessandra Murri2.   

Abstract

To combine the benefits of perimodiolar stimulation with minimal insertion trauma, a thin, pre-curved electrode (CI532) was recently developed by Cochlear Ltd. (Sidney). This array is held straight prior to insertion by an external polymer reloadable sheath that is removed after full electrode insertion. Sixty-seven patients suffering from severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (mean age 42.2 years; mean duration of the hearing loss 19.6 years; mean PTA thresholds at 250-2000 Hz 92.4 dB HL) were implanted with the CI532. Mean duration of surgery was 58.7 min. In 61 patients, a round window (RW) approach was used. In the remaining six cases, a cochleostomy was done because of RW ossification. Impedances and NRT for each electrode are reported. NRT ratio average value was 0.86 ± 0.12 predicting correct scala tympani electrode placement. Post-operative PTA threshold in the implanted ear was 102.9 dB HL. Finally, speech recognition level in quiet at 65 dB HL was 44.6%, after a short follow-up (mean 5.2 months). Our preliminary experience with the new CI532 shows good surgical, electrophysiological, and audiological outcomes. In particular, our results are promising regarding the possibility to achieve minimal insertion trauma and good residual hearing preservation with the use of a deep inserted close modiolar electrode.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI532; Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Perimodiolar stimulation; Round window approach

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29032420     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4774-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  32 in total

1.  Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma.

Authors:  Oliver Adunka; Jan Kiefer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Spread of excitation measurements for the detection of electrode array foldovers: a prospective study comparing 3-dimensional rotational x-ray and intraoperative spread of excitation measurements.

Authors:  Wilko Grolman; Albert Maat; Froukje Verdam; Yvonne Simis; Bart Carelsen; Nicole Freling; Rinze A Tange
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Computer-generated three-dimensional reconstruction of the cochlea.

Authors:  L Ariyasu; F R Galey; R Hilsinger; F M Byl
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Neural response telemetry results with the nucleus 24 contour in a perimodiolar position.

Authors:  Michael D Seidman; Prashant Vivek; William Dickinson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  [Bisyllabic words for speech audiometry: a new italian material].

Authors:  M Turrini; F Cutugno; P Maturi; S Prosser; F A Leoni; E Arslan
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Geoffrey J Service; Nicole M Tombers; Becky J Hughes-Borst; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  From nucleus 24 to 513: changing cochlear implant design affects auditory response thresholds.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.

Authors:  Arie Gordin; Blake Papsin; Adrian James; Karen Gordon
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Development and evaluation of the modiolar research array--multi-centre collaborative study in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Robert J S Briggs; Michael Tykocinski; Roland Lazsig; Antje Aschendorff; Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stöver; Bernard Fraysse; Mathieu Marx; J Thomas Roland; Peter S Roland; Charles G Wright; Bruce J Gantz; James F Patrick; Frank Risi
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-08
View more
  9 in total

1.  The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.

Authors:  C Riemann; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Assessment of cochlear trauma and telemetry measures after cochlear implantation: A comparative study between Nucleus® CI512 and CI532 electrode arrays.

Authors:  Domenico Cuda; Alessandra Murri
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2019-07-11

3.  Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Lee; Jin Hee Han; Marge Carandang; Yun Jung Bae; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Assessing the Placement of the Cochlear Slim Perimodiolar Electrode Array by Trans Impedance Matrix Analysis: A Temporal Bone Study.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos de Miguel; Diego Riol Sancho; Juan Carlos Falcón-González; Joana Pavone; Leandro Rodríguez Herrera; Silvia Borkoski Barreiro; Nadia Falcón Benitez; Ángel Ramos Macias
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Electrophysiological measurements with electrode types of different perimodiolar properties and the same cochlear implant electronics - a retrospective comparison study.

Authors:  A Perenyi; F Toth; B Dimak; R Nagy; P Schoerg; J Jori; J G Kiss; G Sprinzl; M Csanady; L Rovo
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-09-06

6.  Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Nicole Neben; Timo Stöver; Uwe Baumann; Alexander Mewes; Tim Liebscher; Mark Schüssler; Antje Aschendorff; Thomas Wesarg; Andreas Büchner; Paula Greenham; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Nicholas Bevis; Thomas Effertz; Dirk Beutner; Christian Gueldner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Lee; Young Seok Kim; Hyung Dong Jo; Yoonjoong Kim; Marge Carandang; Gene Huh; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode.

Authors:  Sonja Ludwig; Niklas Riemann; Stefan Hans; Florian Christov; Johannes Maximilian Ludwig; Judith Saxe; Diana Arweiler-Harbeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.