Literature DB >> 25723190

High relaxivity Gd(III)-DNA gold nanostars: investigation of shape effects on proton relaxation.

Matthew W Rotz, Kayla S B Culver, Giacomo Parigi1, Keith W MacRenaris, Claudio Luchinat1, Teri W Odom, Thomas J Meade.   

Abstract

Gadolinium(III) nanoconjugate contrast agents (CAs) have distinct advantages over their small-molecule counterparts in magnetic resonance imaging. In addition to increased Gd(III) payload, a significant improvement in proton relaxation efficiency, or relaxivity (r1), is often observed. In this work, we describe the synthesis and characterization of a nanoconjugate CA created by covalent attachment of Gd(III) to thiolated DNA (Gd(III)-DNA), followed by surface conjugation onto gold nanostars (DNA-Gd@stars). These conjugates exhibit remarkable r1 with values up to 98 mM(-1) s(-1). Additionally, DNA-Gd@stars show efficient Gd(III) delivery and biocompatibility in vitro and generate significant contrast enhancement when imaged at 7 T. Using nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion analysis, we attribute the high performance of the DNA-Gd@stars to an increased contribution of second-sphere relaxivity compared to that of spherical CA equivalents (DNA-Gd@spheres). Importantly, the surface of the gold nanostar contains Gd(III)-DNA in regions of positive, negative, and neutral curvature. We hypothesize that the proton relaxation enhancement observed results from the presence of a unique hydrophilic environment produced by Gd(III)-DNA in these regions, which allows second-sphere water molecules to remain adjacent to Gd(III) ions for up to 10 times longer than diffusion. These results establish that particle shape and second-sphere relaxivity are important considerations in the design of Gd(III) nanoconjugate CAs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast agent; gadolinium; magnetic resonance; nanostar; nuclear magnetic resonance dispersion; relaxivity; second-sphere

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25723190      PMCID: PMC4489565          DOI: 10.1021/nn5070953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  45 in total

1.  Large relaxivity enhancement of paramagnetic lipid nanoparticles by restricting the local motions of the Gd(III) chelates.

Authors:  Filip Kielar; Lorenzo Tei; Enzo Terreno; Mauro Botta
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Maximizing DNA loading on a range of gold nanoparticle sizes.

Authors:  Sarah J Hurst; Abigail K R Lytton-Jean; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Lanthanide probes for bioresponsive imaging.

Authors:  Marie C Heffern; Lauren M Matosziuk; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Geometric curvature controls the chemical patchiness and self-assembly of nanoparticles.

Authors:  David A Walker; Emily K Leitsch; Rikkert J Nap; Igal Szleifer; Bartosz A Grzybowski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Gold nanoparticles functionalized with gadolinium chelates as high-relaxivity MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Loïck Moriggi; Caroline Cannizzo; Eddy Dumas; Cédric R Mayer; Alexey Ulianov; Lothar Helm
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Direct observation of nanoparticle-cancer cell nucleus interactions.

Authors:  Duncan Hieu M Dam; Jung Heon Lee; Patrick N Sisco; Dick T Co; Ming Zhang; Michael R Wasielewski; Teri W Odom
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Syntheses and relaxation properties of mixed gadolinium hydroxypyridinonate MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  S M Cohen; J Xu; E Radkov; K N Raymond; M Botta; A Barge; S Aime
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2000-12-11       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Modular polymer-caged nanobins as a theranostic platform with enhanced magnetic resonance relaxivity and pH-responsive drug release.

Authors:  Sang-Min Lee; Ying Song; Bong Jin Hong; Keith W MacRenaris; Daniel J Mastarone; Thomas V O'Halloran; Thomas J Meade; SonBinh T Nguyen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Oligonucleotide loading determines cellular uptake of DNA-modified gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  David A Giljohann; Dwight S Seferos; Pinal C Patel; Jill E Millstone; Nathaniel L Rosi; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Hydrogels incorporating GdDOTA: towards highly efficient dual T1/T2 MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Thomas Courant; Valérie Gaëlle Roullin; Cyril Cadiou; Maïté Callewaert; Marie Christine Andry; Christophe Portefaix; Christine Hoeffel; Marie Christine de Goltstein; Marc Port; Sophie Laurent; Luce Vander Elst; Robert Muller; Michaël Molinari; Françoise Chuburu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  27 in total

1.  Enhancing T1 magnetic resonance imaging contrast with internalized gadolinium(III) in a multilayer nanoparticle.

Authors:  Valeria S Marangoni; Oara Neumann; Luke Henderson; Caterina C Kaffes; Hui Zhang; Runmin Zhang; Sandra Bishnoi; Ciceron Ayala-Orozco; Valtencir Zucolotto; James A Bankson; Peter Nordlander; Naomi J Halas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Markedly Improved Synthetic Approach for the Preparation of Multifunctional Au-DNA Nanoparticle Conjugates Modified with Optical and MR Imaging Probes.

Authors:  Matthew W Rotz; Robert J Holbrook; Keith W MacRenaris; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.774

3.  Gd(III)-Dithiolane Gold Nanoparticles for T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Robert J Holbrook; Nikhil Rammohan; Matthew W Rotz; Keith W MacRenaris; Adam T Preslar; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Shape-Dependent Relaxivity of Nanoparticle-Based T1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Kayla S B Culver; Yu Jin Shin; Matthew W Rotz; Thomas J Meade; Mark C Hersam; Teri W Odom
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gd(III)-Based Contrast Agents: Challenges and Key Advances.

Authors:  Hao Li; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  Advances in gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent designs for monitoring biological processes in vivo.

Authors:  Jacques Lux; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  DNA-gadolinium-gold nanoparticles for in vivo T1 MR imaging of transplanted human neural stem cells.

Authors:  Francesca J Nicholls; Matthew W Rotz; Harmanvir Ghuman; Keith W MacRenaris; Thomas J Meade; Michel Modo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Enhanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Degradation in Breast Cancer Cells by Lysosome-Targeting Gold Nanoconstructs.

Authors:  Hyojin Lee; Duncan Hieu M Dam; Ji Won Ha; Jun Yue; Teri W Odom
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Nanodiamond-Gadolinium(III) Aggregates for Tracking Cancer Growth In Vivo at High Field.

Authors:  Nikhil Rammohan; Keith W MacRenaris; Laura K Moore; Giacomo Parigi; Daniel J Mastarone; Lisa M Manus; Laura M Lilley; Adam T Preslar; Emily A Waters; Abigail Filicko; Claudio Luchinat; Dean Ho; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 10.  Engineering of inorganic nanoparticles as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.

Authors:  Dalong Ni; Wenbo Bu; Emily B Ehlerding; Weibo Cai; Jianlin Shi
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 54.564

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.