Literature DB >> 27960515

Nanodiamond-Gadolinium(III) Aggregates for Tracking Cancer Growth In Vivo at High Field.

Nikhil Rammohan1,2, Keith W MacRenaris1, Laura K Moore2, Giacomo Parigi3, Daniel J Mastarone1, Lisa M Manus1, Laura M Lilley1, Adam T Preslar1, Emily A Waters1, Abigail Filicko1, Claudio Luchinat3, Dean Ho4, Thomas J Meade1,2.   

Abstract

The ability to track labeled cancer cells in vivo would allow researchers to study their distribution, growth, and metastatic potential within the intact organism. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is invaluable for tracking cancer cells in vivo as it benefits from high spatial resolution and the absence of ionizing radiation. However, many MR contrast agents (CAs) required to label cells either do not significantly accumulate in cells or are not biologically compatible for translational studies. We have developed carbon-based nanodiamond-gadolinium(III) aggregates (NDG) for MR imaging that demonstrated remarkable properties for cell tracking in vivo. First, NDG had high relaxivity independent of field strength, a finding unprecedented for gadolinium(III) [Gd(III)]-nanoparticle conjugates. Second, NDG demonstrated a 300-fold increase in the cellular delivery of Gd(III) compared to that of clinical Gd(III) chelates without sacrificing biocompatibility. Further, we were able to monitor the tumor growth of NDG-labeled flank tumors by T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging for 26 days in vivo, longer than was reported for other MR CAs or nuclear agents. Finally, by utilizing quantitative maps of relaxation times, we were able to describe tumor morphology and heterogeneity (corroborated by histological analysis), which would not be possible with competing molecular imaging modalities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Nanodiamonds; cancer; gadolinium; in vivo

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27960515      PMCID: PMC5482002          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


  48 in total

Review 1.  In vivo tracking in cardiac stem cell-based therapy.

Authors:  Kozo Hoshino; Hung Q Ly; John V Frangioni; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 2.  Lanthanide probes for bioresponsive imaging.

Authors:  Marie C Heffern; Lauren M Matosziuk; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Cationic Gd-DTPA liposomes for highly efficient labeling of mesenchymal stem cells and cell tracking with MRI.

Authors:  Jamal Guenoun; Gerben A Koning; Gabriela Doeswijk; Lizanne Bosman; Piotr A Wielopolski; Gabriel P Krestin; Monique R Bernsen
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of transplanted mouse islets labeled with chitosan-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  J-H Juang; J-J Wang; C-R Shen; C-H Kuo; Y-W Chien; H-Y Kuo; Z-T Tsai; T-C Yen
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  DNA-gadolinium-gold nanoparticles for in vivo T1 MR imaging of transplanted human neural stem cells.

Authors:  Francesca J Nicholls; Matthew W Rotz; Harmanvir Ghuman; Keith W MacRenaris; Thomas J Meade; Michel Modo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  In vivo MRI cell tracking: clinical studies.

Authors:  Jeff W M Bulte
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging after manganese injection distinguishes type 2 diabetic and normoglycemic patients.

Authors:  Diomidis Botsikas; Sylvain Terraz; Laurent Vinet; Smaragda Lamprianou; Christoph D Becker; Domenico Bosco; Paolo Meda; Xavier Montet
Journal:  Islets       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Non-Invasive In Vivo Imaging and Quantification of Tumor Growth and Metastasis in Rats Using Cells Expressing Far-Red Fluorescence Protein.

Authors:  Jon Christensen; Daniel Vonwil; V Prasad Shastri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multimeric Near IR-MR Contrast Agent for Multimodal In Vivo Imaging.

Authors:  Victoria S R Harrison; Christiane E Carney; Keith W MacRenaris; Emily A Waters; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Synthesis of nanodiamond derivatives carrying amino functions and quantification by a modified Kaiser test.

Authors:  Gerald Jarre; Steffen Heyer; Elisabeth Memmel; Thomas Meinhardt; Anke Krueger
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.883

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Multifunctional nanodiamonds in regenerative medicine: Recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Jonathan Whitlow; Settimio Pacelli; Arghya Paul
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  A Markedly Improved Synthetic Approach for the Preparation of Multifunctional Au-DNA Nanoparticle Conjugates Modified with Optical and MR Imaging Probes.

Authors:  Matthew W Rotz; Robert J Holbrook; Keith W MacRenaris; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.774

3.  Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gd(III)-Based Contrast Agents: Challenges and Key Advances.

Authors:  Hao Li; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Clinical validation of a nanodiamond-embedded thermoplastic biomaterial.

Authors:  Dong-Keun Lee; Theodore Kee; Zhangrui Liang; Desiree Hsiou; Darron Miya; Brian Wu; Eiji Osawa; Edward Kai-Hua Chow; Eric C Sung; Mo K Kang; Dean Ho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Water-Soluble Nanoconjugate for Enhanced Cellular Delivery of Receptor-Targeted Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Laura K Moore; Michael A Caldwell; Taryn R Townsend; Keith W MacRenaris; Georgette Moyle-Heyrman; Nikhil Rammohan; Erika K Schonher; Joanna E Burdette; Dean Ho; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.774

6.  Phase-Encoded Hyperpolarized Nanodiamond for Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  David E J Waddington; Thomas Boele; Ewa Rej; Dane R McCamey; Nicholas J C King; Torsten Gaebel; David J Reilly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Fluorescent Fe Embedded Magnetic Nanodiamonds Made by Ion Implantation.

Authors:  Bo-Rong Lin; Srinivasu Kunuku; Chien-Hsu Chen; Tzung-Yuang Chen; Tung-Yuan Hsiao; Hung-Kai Yu; Yu-Jen Chang; Li-Chuan Liao; Huan Niu; Chien-Ping Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Artificially engineered antiferromagnetic nanoprobes for ultra-sensitive histopathological level magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zeyu Liang; Qiyue Wang; Hongwei Liao; Meng Zhao; Jiyoung Lee; Chuang Yang; Fangyuan Li; Daishun Ling
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Carbon Nano-Allotrope/Magnetic Nanoparticle Hybrid Nanomaterials as T2 Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Applications.

Authors:  Yunxiang Gao
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-02-06

Review 10.  Gadolinium-containing carbon nanomaterials for magnetic resonance imaging: Trends and challenges.

Authors:  Andrés Rodríguez-Galván; Margarita Rivera; Patricia García-López; Luis A Medina; Vladimir A Basiuk
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.