Literature DB >> 20623210

Minimally invasive monitoring of cardiac output in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

Jamal A Alhashemi1, Maurizio Cecconi, Giorgio della Rocca, Maxime Cannesson, Christoph K Hofer.   

Abstract

Cardiac output monitoring in the cardiac surgery patient is standard practice that is traditionally performed using the pulmonary artery catheter. However, over the past 20 years, the value of pulmonary artery catheters has been challenged, with some authors suggesting that its use might be not only unnecessary but also harmful. New minimally invasive devices that measure cardiac output have become available. In this paper, we review their operative principles, limitations, and utility in an integrated approach that could potentially change patients' outcome. However, it is now clear that it is how the monitor is used (ie, the protocol or therapy associated with its use, or its lack thereof), and not the monitor per se, that should be questioned when a patient's outcome is being evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20623210     DOI: 10.1007/s11897-010-0019-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep        ISSN: 1546-9530


  49 in total

1.  Esophageal Doppler and thermodilution are not interchangeable for determination of cardiac output.

Authors:  Sophie Collins; François Girard; Daniel Boudreault; Philippe Chouinard; Louis Normandin; Pierre Couture; Marie-Josée Caron; Monique Ruel
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Cardiac output by PulseCO is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB.

Authors:  Koichi Yamashita; Tomoki Nishiyama; Takeshi Yokoyama; Hidehiro Abe; Masanobu Manabe
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  C K Hofer; L Furrer; S Matter-Ensner; M Maloigne; R Klaghofer; M Genoni; A Zollinger
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Cardiac output estimation after off-pump coronary artery bypass: a comparison of two different techniques.

Authors:  Dheeraj Arora; Rajesh Chand; Yatin Mehta; Naresh Trehan
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2007-07

5.  A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  P Pölönen; E Ruokonen; M Hippeläinen; M Pöyhönen; J Takala
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  A comparative evaluation of thermodilution and partial CO2 rebreathing techniques for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients during assisted ventilation.

Authors:  Monica Rocco; Gustavo Spadetta; Andrea Morelli; Donatella Dell'Utri; Patrizia Porzi; Giorgio Conti; Paolo Pietropaoli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  G Marx; T Cope; L McCrossan; S Swaraj; C Cowan; S M Mostafa; R Wenstone; M Leuwer
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Passive leg raising.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Ramon Anel; Eugene Bunnell; Kalim Habet; Sergio Zanotti; Stephanie Marshall; Alex Neumann; Amjad Ali; Mary Cheang; Clifford Kavinsky; Joseph E Parrillo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution.

Authors:  L Doering; E Lum; K Dracup; A Friedman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael T Ganter; Jamal A Alhashemi; Adel M Al-Shabasy; Ursina M Schmid; Peter Schott; Sanaa A Shalabi; Ahmed M Badri; Sonja Hartnack; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

3.  Perioperative fluid and volume management: physiological basis, tools and strategies.

Authors:  Mike S Strunden; Kai Heckel; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.925

4.  Cardiac output assessed by invasive and minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Allison J Lee; Jennifer Hochman Cohn; J Sudharma Ranasinghe
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-06

Review 5.  Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?

Authors:  Davinder Ramsingh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.