Literature DB >> 12793554

Trochanteric slide osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty for loosening.

F Langlais1, J C Lambotte, Ph Collin, F Langlois, J W Fontaine, H Thomazeau.   

Abstract

We used a trochanteric slide osteotomy (TSO) in 94 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties (90 with replacement of both the cup and stem). This technique proved to be adequate for removing the components, with few complications (two minor fractures), and for implanting acetabular allografts (18%) and reinforcement devices (23%). Trochanteric union was obtained in most patients (96%), even in those with septic loosening (18/19), major femoral osteolysis (32/32), or previous trochanteric osteotomy (17/18). TSO is versatile, since it can be extended by a femoral flap (four cases) or a distal femoral window (eight cases). Despite significant bone loss, in 24% of the femora and 57% of the acetabula, favourable midterm results were achieved and only six reoperations were required, Including two for trochanteric nonunion and two for loosening. It leaves the lateral femoral cortex intact so that a stem longer than 200 mm was needed in only 25% of patients. This is a considerable advantage compared with the extended trochanteric osteotomy in which the long lateral flap (12 to 14 cm) requires an average length of stem of 220 mm beyond the calcar. TSO provides an approach similar in size to the standard trochanteric osteotomy but with a rate of nonunion of 4% versus 15%. It reduces the risk of difficulties with removal of the stem, and removes the need for routine distal anchoring of long revision stems. The limited distal femoral compromise is very important in patients with a long life expectancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12793554     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b4.13301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  6 in total

1.  Does trochanteric step osteotomy provide greater stability than classic slide osteotomy? A preliminary study.

Authors:  Ralf Schoeniger; Amy E LaFrance; Thomas R Oxland; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Osteotomy of the greater trochanter].

Authors:  K Anagnostakos; D Kohn; O Lorbach
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.

Authors:  Tomas Amenabar; Wael A Rahman; Bandar M Hetaimish; Paul R Kuzyk; Oleg A Safir; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A novel surgical tool for the revision hip arthroplasty due to neck stem's fracture.

Authors:  T B Grivas; E Magnissalis; S Papadakis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions.

Authors:  Frantz L Langlais; Mickaël Ropars; François Gaucher; Thierry Musset; Olivier Chaix
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kavin Sundaram; Ahmed Siddiqi; Atul F Kamath; Carlos A Higuera-Rueda
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-09-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.