Literature DB >> 11503115

Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

C Perka1, R Ludwig.   

Abstract

Sixty-three Burch-Schneider rings in 62 patients with segmental or combined defects were followed up after a mean of 5.45 years. The mean Harris hip score was 74.9 points. Aseptic loosening occurred in 3 cases, and septic loosening occurred in 2 cases. All cases of aseptic loosening had Paprosky stage IIIb defects and defects of the posterior column. Radiologic migration analysis showed increased migration with increase in the Paprosky defect stage, defects of the posterior column, and cranial defects. The cage has the lowest migration and loosening rate in cases with medial defects or anterior column defects. Surgical treatment of defects of the posterior column is associated with an increased rate of aseptic loosening, whereas implantation with cranial defects shows a higher migration rate with no significant increase in loosening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11503115     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.23919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  32 in total

1.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  CORR Insights(®): Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Thomas Jefferson Blumenfeld
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system].

Authors:  K-P Günther; T Wegner; S Kirschner; A Hartmann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area estimates of depression and anxiety using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 in the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Tara W Strine; Satvinder S Dhingra; Kurt Kroenke; Mohamed Qayad; James L Ribble; Catherine A Okoro; Lina S Balluz; Shanta R Dube; James Lando; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 7.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  [Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?].

Authors:  S Gravius; G Pagenstert; O Weber; N Kraska; H Röhrig; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Late fracture of a Burch-Schneider acetabular cage: rare occurrence following polyethylene cup wear.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Alessandra Rizzo; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-26

10.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.