Literature DB >> 25710118

Justification and good practice in using handheld portable dental X-ray equipment: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR).

W E R Berkhout1, A Suomalainen2, D Brüllmann3, R Jacobs4, K Horner5, H C Stamatakis6.   

Abstract

Handheld portable X-ray devices are increasingly used for intraoral radiography. This development introduces new challenges to staff and patient safety, for which new or revised risk assessments must be made and acted upon prior to use. Major issues might be: difficulties in using rectangular collimation with beam aiming devices, more complex matching of exposure settings to the X-ray receptor used (e.g. longer exposure times), movements owing to the units' weight, protection of the operator and third persons, and the use in uncontrolled environments. These problems may result in violation of the "as low as reasonably achievable'', that is, ALARA principle by an increase in (re)exposures compared with the other available intraoral X-ray devices. Hence, the use of handheld portable X-ray devices should be considered only after careful and documented evaluation (which might be performed based on medical physics support), when there is evidence that handheld operation has benefits over traditional modalities and when no new risks to the operators and/or third parties are caused. It is expected that the use of handheld portable X-ray devices will be very exceptional, and for justified situations only. Special attention should be drawn to beam-aiming devices, rectangular collimation, the section of the X-ray receptor, focus-skin distance, and backscatter shielding, and that the unit delivers reproducible dose over the full set of environmental conditions (e.g. battery status and temperature).

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray; dental; handheld; portable

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25710118      PMCID: PMC4628399          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  12 in total

1.  Effect of the amount of battery charge on tube voltage in different hand-held dental x-ray systems.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-03-22

2.  Maintaining radiation exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) for dental personnel operating portable hand-held x-ray equipment.

Authors:  Thomas J McGiff; Robert A Danforth; Edward E Herschaft
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Operator exposure to scatter radiation from a portable hand-held dental radiation emitting device (Aribex NOMAD) while making 915 intraoral dental radiographs.

Authors:  Robert A Danforth; Edward E Herschaft; John A Leonowich
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 1.832

4.  [Medical electrical equipment--Part 1-3: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance--collateral standard: radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray equipment JIS T 0601-1-3].

Authors:  Yoshio Imai
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2009-11-20

5.  New York moves to facilitate the use of hand-held X-ray devices.

Authors:  Steven L Essig
Journal:  N Y State Dent J       Date:  2009 Jun-Jul

6.  Hand-held dental X-ray (HDX) with medical collimator: use in casualty radiology.

Authors:  J Coy
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Use of the hand-held dental X-ray machine during joint operation, NATO exercise Display Determination-92.

Authors:  J Coy; R H Vandre; W R Davidson
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Information yield from a hand-held dental x-ray unit.

Authors:  M L Van Dis; D A Miles; E T Parks; T F Razmus
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1993-09

9.  Forensic odontology in the disaster victim identification process.

Authors:  P Pittayapat; R Jacobs; E De Valck; D Vandermeulen; G Willems
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2012-07-01

10.  Radiation exposure with the NOMAD portable X-ray system.

Authors:  A D Goren; M Bonvento; J Biernacki; D C Colosi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  9 in total

1.  Assessment of image quality and exposure parameters of an intraoral portable X-rays device.

Authors:  Elton G Zenóbio; Madelon Af Zenóbio; Carolina Db Azevedo; Maria do Socorro Nogueira; Cláudio D Almeida; Flávio R Manzi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Electronic processing of digital panoramic radiography for the detection of apical periodontitis.

Authors:  Cosimo Nardi; Linda Calistri; Michele Pietragalla; Chiara Vignoli; Chiara Lorini; Valentina Berti; Francesco Mungai; Stefano Colagrande
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Korean dentists' perceptions and attitudes regarding radiation safety and protection.

Authors:  Seo-Young An; Kyung-Min Lee; Jae-Seo Lee
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Operator safety during the acquisition of intraoral images with a handheld and portable X-ray device.

Authors:  Dennis Rottke; Lisa Gohlke; Robert Schrödel; Stefan Hassfeld; Dirk Schulze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Precision of aiming with a portable X-ray device (Nomad Pro 2) compared to a wall-mounted device in intraoral radiography.

Authors:  Reinier C Hoogeveen; Bram R Meertens; W Erwin R Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Can exposure to panoramic radiographs induce genotoxic effects on the oral epithelium? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcos Antônio Lima Dos Santos; Graziane Ribeiro Couto; Mark Jon Santana Sabey; Danilo de Paula Ribeiro Borges; Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Diagnostic image quality of hand-held and wall-mounted X-ray devices in bitewing radiography: a non-inferiority clinical trial.

Authors:  Reinier Cornelis Hoogeveen; Siham Ouchene; Wer Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Evaluation of stray radiation to the operator for five hand-held dental X-ray devices.

Authors:  Richard Smith; Richard Tremblay; Graeme M Wardlaw
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  The way we were (and how we got here): fifty years of technology changes in dental and maxillofacial radiology.

Authors:  Roberto Molteni
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.419

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.