Literature DB >> 22474641

Effect of the amount of battery charge on tube voltage in different hand-held dental x-ray systems.

Eun-Kyung Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hand-held dental x-ray system is a self contained x-ray machine designed to perform intraoral radiography with one or two hands. The issue about its usage as general dental radiography is still in dispute. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between the amount of battery charge and the tube voltage in different hand-held dental x-ray systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven hand-held dental x-ray units were used for the study. Tube voltage was measured with Unfors ThinX RAD (Unfors Instruments AB, Billdal, Sweden) for 3 consecutive exposures at the different amount of battery charge of each unit. The average and the deviation percentage of measured kV from indicated kV of each unit were calculated.
RESULTS: Tube voltage of only 1 unit was 70 kV (indicated by manufacturer) and those of the others were 60 kV. Tube voltage deviation percentage from the indicated kV at the fully charged battery was from 2.5% to -5.5% and from -0.8% to -10.0% at the lowest charged battery.
CONCLUSION: Tube voltages of all units decreased as the residual amount of the battery charge decreased. It is suggested that the performance test for hand-held x-ray system should be performed for the minimum residual charged battery as well as the full charged one. Persistent battery charging is suggested to maintain the proper tube voltage of the hand-held portable x-ray system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Occupational Exposure; Radiation Protection; Radiation, Ionizing; Radiography, Dental

Year:  2012        PMID: 22474641      PMCID: PMC3314831          DOI: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent        ISSN: 2233-7822


  2 in total

1.  Information yield from a hand-held dental x-ray unit.

Authors:  M L Van Dis; D A Miles; E T Parks; T F Razmus
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1993-09

2.  Radiation exposure with the NOMAD portable X-ray system.

Authors:  A D Goren; M Bonvento; J Biernacki; D C Colosi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.419

  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  The effects of device position on the operator's radiation dose when using a handheld portable X-ray device.

Authors:  Jimmy Makdissi; Ravikiran R Pawar; Ben Johnson; Bun S Chong
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Assessment of image quality and exposure parameters of an intraoral portable X-rays device.

Authors:  Elton G Zenóbio; Madelon Af Zenóbio; Carolina Db Azevedo; Maria do Socorro Nogueira; Cláudio D Almeida; Flávio R Manzi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Justification and good practice in using handheld portable dental X-ray equipment: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR).

Authors:  W E R Berkhout; A Suomalainen; D Brüllmann; R Jacobs; K Horner; H C Stamatakis
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Precision of aiming with a portable X-ray device (Nomad Pro 2) compared to a wall-mounted device in intraoral radiography.

Authors:  Reinier C Hoogeveen; Bram R Meertens; W Erwin R Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.419

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.