Dennis Rottke1,2, Lisa Gohlke2, Robert Schrödel3, Stefan Hassfeld1, Dirk Schulze2. 1. 1 Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Health, University Witten/Herdecke, Hospital Dortmund , Witten/Herdecke , Germany. 2. 2 Digital Diagnostic Center Ltd , Freiburg im Breisgau , Germany. 3. 3 PTW-Freiburg Ltd , Freiburg im Breisgau , Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The present study aims at investigating different radiation protection issues and dose values while acquiring intraoral images with a handheld X-ray device. METHODS: An Aribex NOMAD Pro 2™, a RANDO® male head phantom, a consistency testing body, a PTW NOMEX® Multimeter, and a PTW Farmer® Ionization Chamber Type 30,010 were used to investigate: (1) dose area products; (2) the expansion of the control area (CA); (3) the scattering pattern and (4) the potential risk for operators of the X-ray device. RESULTS: Dose area products at different exposure times were distributed linearly with a high correlation factor (>0.9). At 4000 simulated exposures, the greatest extent of the CA was 42 cm (mean = 16.7 cm, SD = 10.8 cm). The highest occurrence of scattering radiation resulted between the RANDO® phantom and the X-ray device. No scattered radiation was measured at the dorsal part of the phantom or on the operator site of a virtual vertical plane through the focal spot of the X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: Through this study, we could demonstrate that the application of an Aribex NOMAD Pro 2 device for intraoral imaging does not increase the risk for the operator if the device is controlled according to the manufacturer's specifications. Furthermore, we were able to show that the CA was significantly smaller than specified by European and other international radiation protection standards.
OBJECTIVES: The present study aims at investigating different radiation protection issues and dose values while acquiring intraoral images with a handheld X-ray device. METHODS: An Aribex NOMAD Pro 2™, a RANDO® male head phantom, a consistency testing body, a PTW NOMEX® Multimeter, and a PTW Farmer® Ionization Chamber Type 30,010 were used to investigate: (1) dose area products; (2) the expansion of the control area (CA); (3) the scattering pattern and (4) the potential risk for operators of the X-ray device. RESULTS: Dose area products at different exposure times were distributed linearly with a high correlation factor (>0.9). At 4000 simulated exposures, the greatest extent of the CA was 42 cm (mean = 16.7 cm, SD = 10.8 cm). The highest occurrence of scattering radiation resulted between the RANDO® phantom and the X-ray device. No scattered radiation was measured at the dorsal part of the phantom or on the operator site of a virtual vertical plane through the focal spot of the X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: Through this study, we could demonstrate that the application of an Aribex NOMAD Pro 2 device for intraoral imaging does not increase the risk for the operator if the device is controlled according to the manufacturer's specifications. Furthermore, we were able to show that the CA was significantly smaller than specified by European and other international radiation protection standards.
Authors: Reinier C Hoogeveen; Bart Hazenoot; Gerard C H Sanderink; W Erwin R Berkhout Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: W E R Berkhout; A Suomalainen; D Brüllmann; R Jacobs; K Horner; H C Stamatakis Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Julian Lommen; Lara Schorn; Julia Nitschke; Christoph Sproll; Uwe Zeller; Norbert R Kübler; Jörg Handschel; Henrik Holtmann Journal: Saudi Dent J Date: 2021-09-20