Literature DB >> 25683902

An investigation of PRESAGE® 3D dosimetry for IMRT and VMAT radiation therapy treatment verification.

Jake Jackson1, Titania Juang, John Adamovics, Mark Oldham.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to characterize three formulations of PRESAGE(®) dosimeters (DEA-1, DEA-2, and DX) and to identify optimal readout timing and procedures for accurate in-house 3D dosimetry. The optimal formulation and procedure was then applied for the verification of an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment technique. PRESAGE(®) formulations were studied for their temporal stability post-irradiation, sensitivity, and linearity of dose response. Dosimeters were read out using a high-resolution optical-CT scanner. Small volumes of PRESAGE(®) were irradiated to investigate possible differences in sensitivity for large and small volumes ('volume effect'). The optimal formulation and read-out technique was applied to the verification of two patient treatments: an IMRT plan and a VMAT plan. A gradual decrease in post-irradiation optical-density was observed in all formulations with DEA-1 exhibiting the best temporal stability with less than 4% variation between 2-22 h post-irradiation. A linear dose response at the 4 h time point was observed for all formulations with an R(2) value >0.99. A large volume effect was observed for DEA-1 with sensitivity of the large dosimeter being ~63% less than the sensitivity of the cuvettes. For the IMRT and VMAT treatments, the 3D gamma passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria using absolute measured dose were 99.6 and 94.5% for the IMRT and VMAT treatments, respectively. In summary, this work shows that accurate 3D dosimetry is possible with all three PRESAGE(®) formulations. The optimal imaging windows post-irradiation were 3-24 h, 2-6 h, and immediately for the DEA-1, DEA-2, and DX formulations, respectively. Because of the large volume effect, small volume cuvettes are not yet a reliable method for calibration of larger dosimeters to absolute dose. Finally, PRESAGE(®) is observed to be a useful method of 3D verification when careful consideration is given to the temporal stability and imaging protocols for the specific formulation used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25683902      PMCID: PMC4764093          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  Preliminary commissioning investigations with the DMOS-RPC optical-CT Scanner.

Authors:  J Newton; A Thomas; G Ibbott; M Oldham
Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser       Date:  2010

2.  Characterization of a new radiochromic three-dimensional dosimeter.

Authors:  P Y Guo; J A Adamovics; M Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A basic dosimetric study of PRESAGE: the effect of different amounts of fabricating components on the sensitivity and stability of the dosimeter.

Authors:  A Mostaar; B Hashemi; M H Zahmatkesh; S M R Aghamiri; S R Mahdavi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Investigation of the feasibility of relative 3D dosimetry in the Radiologic Physics Center Head and Neck IMRT phantom using presage/optical-CT.

Authors:  Harshad Sakhalkar; David Sterling; John Adamovics; Geoffrey Ibbott; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Characterization of the optical properties and stability of Presage™ following irradiation with photons and carbon ions.

Authors:  Esben S Yates; Peter Balling; Jørgen B B Petersen; Mehrnaz N Christensen; Peter S Skyt; Niels Bassler; Franz-Joachim Kaiser; Ludvig P Muren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  A quality assurance method that utilizes 3D dosimetry and facilitates clinical interpretation.

Authors:  Mark Oldham; Andrew Thomas; Jennifer O'Daniel; Titania Juang; Geoffrey Ibbott; John Adamovics; John P Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  On the feasibility of comprehensive high-resolution 3D remote dosimetry.

Authors:  Titania Juang; Ryan Grant; John Adamovics; Geoffrey Ibbott; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A method to correct for spectral artifacts in optical-CT dosimetry.

Authors:  Andrew Thomas; Michael Pierquet; Kevin Jordan; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A method to correct for stray light in telecentric optical-CT imaging of radiochromic dosimeters.

Authors:  Andrew Thomas; Joseph Newton; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Customising PRESAGE® for diverse applications.

Authors:  T Juang; J Newton; M Niebanck; R Benning; J Adamovics; M Oldham
Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser       Date:  2013
View more
  8 in total

1.  Radiological tissue equivalence of deformable silicone-based chemical radiation dosimeters (FlexyDos3D).

Authors:  Yi Du; Ruoxi Wang; Meijiao Wang; Haizhen Yue; Yibao Zhang; Hao Wu; Weihu Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Fiducial detection and registration for 3D IMRT QA with organ-specific dose information.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Wang; Olga Dona; Yuanguang Xu; John Adamovics; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Dosimetric characteristics of a reusable 3D radiochromic dosimetry material.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; So-Yeon Park; Chang Heon Choi; Minsoo Chun; Ji Hye Han; Jin Dong Cho; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Three-dimensional radiation dosimetry using polymer gel and solid radiochromic polymer: From basics to clinical applications.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Leighton Warmington; N Gopishankar
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-28

Review 5.  A Review of PRESAGE Radiochromic Polymer and the Compositions for Application in Radiotherapy Dosimetry.

Authors:  Muhammad Zamir Mohyedin; Hafiz Mohd Zin; Mohd Zulfadli Adenan; Ahmad Taufek Abdul Rahman
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 6.  Radiation Dosimetry by Use of Radiosensitive Hydrogels and Polymers: Mechanisms, State-of-the-Art and Perspective from 3D to 4D.

Authors:  Yves De Deene
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-09-19

7.  Investigating the effect of a magnetic field on dose distributions at phantom-air interfaces using PRESAGE® 3D dosimeter and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Filipa Costa; Simon J Doran; Ian M Hanson; Simeon Nill; Ilias Billas; David Shipley; Simon Duane; John Adamovics; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Improvement in sensitivity of radiochromic 3D dosimeter based on rigid polyurethane resin by incorporating tartrazine.

Authors:  Jin Dong Cho; Jaeman Son; Chang Heon Choi; Jin Sung Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jong Min Park; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.