Literature DB >> 24567739

Customising PRESAGE® for diverse applications.

T Juang1, J Newton1, M Niebanck1, R Benning2, J Adamovics2, M Oldham1.   

Abstract

PRESAGE® is a solid radiochromic dosimeter consisting of a polyurethane matrix, a triarylmethane leuco dye, and a trihalomethane initiator. Varying the composition and/or relative amounts of these constituents can affect the dose sensitivity, post-irradiation stability, and physical properties of the dosimeter. This allows customisation of PRESAGE® to meet application-specific requirements, such as low sensitivity for high dose applications, stability for remote dosimetry, optical clearing for reusability, and tissue-like elasticity for deformable dosimetry. This study evaluates five hard, non-deformable PRESAGE® formulations and six deformable PRESAGE® formulations and characterizes them for dose sensitivity and stability. Results demonstrated sensitivities in the range of 0.0029 - 0.0467 ΔOD/(Gy·cm) for hard formulations and 0.0003 - 0.0056 ΔOD/(Gy·cm) for deformable formulations. Exceptional stability was seen in both standard and low sensitivity non-deformable formulations, with promising applications for remote dosimetry. Deformable formulations exhibited potential for reusability with strong post-irradiation optical clearing. Tensile compression testing of the deformable formulations showed elastic response consistent with soft tissues, with further testing required for direct comparison. These results demonstrate that PRESAGE® dosimeters have the flexibility to be adapted for a wide spectrum of clinical applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24567739      PMCID: PMC3932063          DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser        ISSN: 1742-6588


1. Introduction

PRESAGE® is a solid radiochromic dosimeter with the potential for use across a wide range of clinical applications [1-3]. In order to maximize PRESAGE®’s usefulness as a 3D dosimetry [4] tool, the dosimeter must be adaptable to meet application-specific dosimetry requirements. Examples of application-specific considerations are listed in table 1.
Table 1

Examples of Application-Specific Dosimetry Considerations

ApplicationConsiderations
IMRT, VMATTissue equivalent electron densityVolume-independent dose responseUn-irradiated transparency
RadiosurgeryHigh doses require low sensitivity
Remote dosimetryPost-irradiation stability, low thermal effects
BrachytherapyTissue equivalence, high sensitivity, good stability
Deformable dosimetryElastic properties comparable to human tissues
Reusable dosimetersStable immediately post-RT, then optical clearing
The components of PRESAGE® are a transparent polyurethane matrix (approximately 90% of the PRESAGE® dosimeter by weight), a triarylmethane leuco dye, and a trihalomethane initiator. Formulations customized to specific applications can be made by varying the composition and/or relative amounts of these constituents. Physical characteristics (transparency, elasticity) of the PRESAGE® polyurethane matrix are dependent on the starting monomeric isocyanate and polyol, which are catalyzed by metal compounds. Recent studies have shown that the composition of these metal compounds and the trihalomethane initiator both influence dosimeter sensitivity [5, 6]. This study evaluates several formulations of PRESAGE®, including novel deformable formulations under initial stages of development, and characterizes them for a range of dose sensitivities and post-irradiation stability.

2. Methods

2.1. PRESAGE® Chemistry and Synthesis

The five formulations of the standard hard (Shore D Hardness 80) PRESAGE® (including two low sensitivity formulations specifically designed for high-dose applications) and six formulations of the deformable (Shore A Hardness 10–20) PRESAGE® under investigation are listed in detail in table 2. The leuco dye leucomalachite green (LMG) and its derivatives were synthesized by placing 1 equivalent of the corresponding aldedyde N,N-dimethylaniline (6 eq) and benzene (0.5M with respect to the aldehyde) in a flask fitted with a Dean-Stark trap and reflux condenser. p-Toluenesulfonic acid (0.1 eq) was added to the mixture and the solution refluxed. The reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography until completion and worked up by diluting with benzene and washing with 10% sodium bicarbonate solution. The benzene and excess aniline were removed via azeotrope distillation with water. Flash column chromatography was performed to further purify the products. One LMG derivative (o-MeO-LMG DEA) was synthesized using N,N-diethylaniline.
Table 2

PRESAGE® formulations under evaluation.

FormulationLeuco DyeInitiator Content (%)Peak λ (nm)
Non-DeformableSS1 (standard sensitivity)2.0% LMG0.75%633
SS2 (standard sensitivity)2.0% LMG0.50%633
SS3 (standard sensitivity)1.7% o-MeO-LMG0.40%633
LS1 (low sensitivity)1.5% LMG0.75%633
LS3 (low sensitivity)1.0% o-MeO-LMG0.75%633

DeformableD12.0% o-MeO-LMG0.50%633
D22.0% o-MeO-LMG-DEA0.50%633
D32.0% p-MeO-LMG0.50%620
D42.0% dimethyl-LMG0.50%633
D52.0% o-Cl-LMG0.50%647
D62.0% o-Br-LMG0.50%639

2.2. PRESAGE® Formulation Characterization

2.2.1. Sensitivity

Sensitivity was determined from the change in optical density in sets of cuvettes containing each formulation under evaluation. Each set of cuvettes was irradiated on a 6 MV linac to known doses between 0 – 25 Gy for low sensitivity formulations and 0 – 8 Gy for all other formulations. Change in optical density was acquired using a Thermo Spectronic Genesys 20 spectrophotometer, and determined by subtracting the pre-irradiation absorption from the post-irradiation absorption for each cuvette at the peak absorption wavelength for each formulation. Cuvettes were stored in the dark following irradiation and tracked for up to 14 days to determine post-irradiation stability.

2.2.2. Tensile testing

The six deformable PRESAGE® formulations were subjected to tensile compression testing to evaluate the elasticity of the formulations. While Young’s modulus values for elastic materials, such as soft biological tissues and deformable PRESAGE®, are highly dependent on the method of deformation [1], consistent tensile measurements allow an initial elasticity comparison between formulations. 10 mm × 10 mm × 25 mm samples of each formulation were subjected to compression by 80% (8 mm) at a rate of 2 mm/min using a Lloyd Model LRX Plus tensile tester.

3. Results

3.1. Sensitivity

The immediate post-irradiation sensitivities of each formulation are listed in table 3. All formulations exhibited a linear dose response. In the non-deformable formulations, use of o-MeO-LMG in the SS3 formulation increased the dosimeter dose sensitivity by approximately two-fold even with decreased initiator content. Deformable PRESAGE® formulations were found to exhibit sensitivities one order of magnitude lower than that of comparable formulations using the non-elastic polyurethane matrix.
Table 3

PRESAGE® sensitivity.

FormulationSensitivity (ΔOD/(Gy·cm))FormulationSensitivity (ΔOD/(Gy·cm))
ImmediateImmediate2 days
Non-DeformableSS10.0225DeformableD10.0012--
SS20.0213D20.0014--
SS30.0467D30.00560.0002
LS10.0102D40.00340.0028
LS30.0029D5D60.00050.0003----

3.2. Post-irradiation Stability

Normalized post-irradiation sensitivities over time are shown in figure 1 for the five non-deformable PRESAGE® formulations. This figure illustrates the wide variety of response – from OD darkening (increasing sensitivity over time) to optical clearing (decreasing sensitivity over time) – achievable through modifications to the leuco dye and initiator. Exceptional post-irradiation stability (variation ≤1%) was exhibited by both standard sensitivity (SS3) and low sensitivity (LS1) formulations, suggesting promising applications in remote dosimetry for both standard and high dose applications.
Figure 1

Normalized sensitivity over 14 days for all non-deformable formulations.

Sensitivity measurements were taken of the two most sensitive deformable formulations (D3 and D4) 2 days following irradiation as an initial assessment of post-irradiation characteristics (table 3). Both formulations exhibited decreases in sensitivity and ΔOD, suggesting potential reusability.

3.3. Elasticity of Deformable Formulations

Stress-strain curves for all deformable formulations are plotted in figure 2. The elastic response of all formulations show a stress-dependent Young’s modulus (stress/strain) and increasing resistance to deformation with increasing applied stress, which is consistent with most soft biological tissues [7]. Further tensile testing is required to directly compare deformable PRESAGE® elasticity to that of tissues of interest.
Figure 2

Stress-strain curves for deformable formulations determined through tensile compression. All samples were compressed by 80% (8 mm deflection). Young’s modulus is represented by the slopes of the curves and is stress-dependent.

4. Conclusion

All PRESAGE® dosimeter formulations have in common a polyurethane matrix, a triarylmethane leuco dye, and a trihalomethane initiator which can be varied to adjust the properties of the dosimeter to suit application-specific dosimetry requirements. The most frequently used leuco dye has been LMG, but as shown above, formulations synthesized with the LMG derivative o-MeO-LMG are both more dose-sensitive per weight and more stable post-irradiation. Our results demonstrate that PRESAGE® dosimeters have the flexibility to be adapted for use in a wide spectrum of clinical applications, including low sensitivity for high dose applications, elasticity for deformable dose tracking, post-irradiation stability for remote dosimetry, and clearing for reusability.
  7 in total

1.  Investigation of radiological properties and water equivalency of PRESAGE dosimeters.

Authors:  Tina Gorjiara; Robin Hill; Zdenka Kuncic; John Adamovics; Stephen Bosi; Jung-Ha Kim; Clive Baldock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Indentation versus tensile measurements of Young's modulus for soft biological tissues.

Authors:  Clayton T McKee; Julie A Last; Paul Russell; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Commissioning and benchmarking a 3D dosimetry system for clinical use.

Authors:  Andrew Thomas; Joseph Newton; John Adamovics; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Investigation into the feasibility of using PRESAGE/optical-CT dosimetry for the verification of gating treatments.

Authors:  Samuel L Brady; William E Brown; Corey G Clift; Sua Yoo; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Polymer gel dosimetry.

Authors:  C Baldock; Y De Deene; S Doran; G Ibbott; A Jirasek; M Lepage; K B McAuley; M Oldham; L J Schreiner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Toward acquiring comprehensive radiosurgery field commissioning data using the PRESAGE/optical-CT 3D dosimetry system.

Authors:  Corey Clift; Andrew Thomas; John Adamovics; Zheng Chang; Indra Das; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Radiological properties of the PRESAGE and PAGAT polymer dosimeters.

Authors:  S Brown; A Venning; Y De Deene; P Vial; L Oliver; J Adamovics; C Baldock
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 1.513

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  An investigation of a PRESAGE® in vivo dosimeter for brachytherapy.

Authors:  A K Vidovic; T Juang; S Meltsner; J Adamovics; J Chino; B Steffey; O Craciunescu; M Oldham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  On the feasibility of polyurethane based 3D dosimeters with optical CT for dosimetric verification of low energy photon brachytherapy seeds.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Yun Yang; Titania Juang; Kelsey Chisholm; Leith Rankine; John Adamovics; Fang Fang Yin; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Investigations into the feasibility of optical-CT 3D dosimetry with minimal use of refractively matched fluids.

Authors:  Kelsey Chisholm; Devin Miles; Leith Rankine; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  An investigation of PRESAGE® 3D dosimetry for IMRT and VMAT radiation therapy treatment verification.

Authors:  Jake Jackson; Titania Juang; John Adamovics; Mark Oldham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Optical-CT 3D Dosimetry Using Fresnel Lenses with Minimal Refractive-Index Matching Fluid.

Authors:  Steven Bache; Javian Malcolm; John Adamovics; Mark Oldham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A Review of PRESAGE Radiochromic Polymer and the Compositions for Application in Radiotherapy Dosimetry.

Authors:  Muhammad Zamir Mohyedin; Hafiz Mohd Zin; Mohd Zulfadli Adenan; Ahmad Taufek Abdul Rahman
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.967

7.  Improvement in sensitivity of radiochromic 3D dosimeter based on rigid polyurethane resin by incorporating tartrazine.

Authors:  Jin Dong Cho; Jaeman Son; Chang Heon Choi; Jin Sung Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jong Min Park; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.