Literature DB >> 26473627

AB-Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions.

Sarah Sirin1, James R Apgar2, Eric M Bennett2, Amy E Keating1,3.   

Abstract

Antibodies (Abs) are a crucial component of the immune system and are often used as diagnostic and therapeutic agents. The need for high-affinity and high-specificity antibodies in research and medicine is driving the development of computational tools for accelerating antibody design and discovery. We report a diverse set of antibody binding data with accompanying structures that can be used to evaluate methods for modeling antibody interactions. Our Antibody-Bind (AB-Bind) database includes 1101 mutants with experimentally determined changes in binding free energies (ΔΔG) across 32 complexes. Using the AB-Bind data set, we evaluated the performance of protein scoring potentials in their ability to predict changes in binding free energies upon mutagenesis. Numerical correlations between computed and observed ΔΔG values were low (r = 0.16-0.45), but the potentials exhibited predictive power for classifying variants as improved vs weakened binders. Performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves; the highest AUC values for 527 mutants with |ΔΔG| > 1.0 kcal/mol were 0.81, 0.87, and 0.88 using STATIUM, FoldX, and Discovery Studio scoring potentials, respectively. Some methods could also enrich for variants with improved binding affinity; FoldX and Discovery Studio were able to correctly rank 42% and 30%, respectively, of the 80 most improved binders (those with ΔΔG < -1.0 kcal/mol) in the top 5% of the database. This modest predictive performance has value but demonstrates the continuing need to develop and improve protein energy functions for affinity prediction.
© 2015 The Protein Society.

Keywords:  affinity optimization; antibody affinity; antibody mutagenesis; computational affinity prediction; mutational database; protein interface design; protein-protein interactions; scoring interface mutations; structure-based modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26473627      PMCID: PMC4815335          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  74 in total

1.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations.

Authors:  Raphael Guerois; Jens Erik Nielsen; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution.

Authors:  Emmanuel D Levy
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Joshua Williams; Yujie Wu; Wolfgang Damm; John Shelley; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  The use of consensus scoring in ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  J Christian Baber; William A Shirley; Yinghong Gao; Miklos Feher
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Progress in computational protein design.

Authors:  Shaun M Lippow; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX.

Authors:  Julie D Thompson; Toby J Gibson; Des G Higgins
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-08

7.  Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2014.

Authors:  Gary Walsh
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  Genome-wide prediction of SH2 domain targets using structural information and the FoldX algorithm.

Authors:  Ignacio E Sánchez; Pedro Beltrao; Francois Stricher; Joost Schymkowitz; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg; Frederic Rousseau; Luis Serrano
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  29 in total

1.  Understanding differences between synthetic and natural antibodies can help improve antibody engineering.

Authors:  Anat Burkovitz; Yanay Ofran
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  mCSM-PPI2: predicting the effects of mutations on protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Carlos H M Rodrigues; Yoochan Myung; Douglas E V Pires; David B Ascher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Beyond CDR-grafting: Structure-guided humanization of framework and CDR regions of an anti-myostatin antibody.

Authors:  James R Apgar; Michelle Mader; Rita Agostinelli; Susan Benard; Peter Bialek; Mark Johnson; Yijie Gao; Mark Krebs; Jane Owens; Kevin Parris; Michael St Andre; Kris Svenson; Carl Morris; Lioudmila Tchistiakova
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 4.  Structure function relations in PDZ-domain-containing proteins: Implications for protein networks in cellular signalling.

Authors:  G P Manjunath; Praveena L Ramanujam; Sanjeev Galande
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  mmCSM-AB: guiding rational antibody engineering through multiple point mutations.

Authors:  Yoochan Myung; Douglas E V Pires; David B Ascher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  ATLAS: A database linking binding affinities with structures for wild-type and mutant TCR-pMHC complexes.

Authors:  Tyler Borrman; Jennifer Cimons; Michael Cosiano; Michael Purcaro; Brian G Pierce; Brian M Baker; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-02-16

7.  Enriching Peptide Libraries for Binding Affinity and Specificity Through Computationally Directed Library Design.

Authors:  Glenna Wink Foight; T Scott Chen; Daniel Richman; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

Review 8.  Designing helical peptide inhibitors of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Raheleh Rezaei Araghi; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Molecular Basis for Necitumumab Inhibition of EGFR Variants Associated with Acquired Cetuximab Resistance.

Authors:  Atrish Bagchi; Jaafar N Haidar; Scott W Eastman; Michal Vieth; Michael Topper; Michelle D Iacolina; Jason M Walker; Amelie Forest; Yang Shen; Ruslan D Novosiadly; Kathryn M Ferguson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 10.  Current advances in biopharmaceutical informatics: guidelines, impact and challenges in the computational developability assessment of antibody therapeutics.

Authors:  Rahul Khetan; Robin Curtis; Charlotte M Deane; Johannes Thorling Hadsund; Uddipan Kar; Konrad Krawczyk; Daisuke Kuroda; Sarah A Robinson; Pietro Sormanni; Kouhei Tsumoto; Jim Warwicker; Andrew C R Martin
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.