Literature DB >> 27562018

Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Nanjie Deng1, William F Flynn2, Junchao Xia2, R S K Vijayan2, Baofeng Zhang3, Peng He2, Ahmet Mentes2, Emilio Gallicchio3, Ronald M Levy4,5.   

Abstract

We describe binding free energy calculations in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 for blind prediction of the binding affinities of 180 ligands to Hsp90. The present D3R challenge was built around experimental datasets involving Heat shock protein (Hsp) 90, an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone which is an important anticancer drug target. The Hsp90 ATP binding site is known to be a challenging target for accurate calculations of ligand binding affinities because of the ligand-dependent conformational changes in the binding site, the presence of ordered waters and the broad chemical diversity of ligands that can bind at this site. Our primary focus here is to distinguish binders from nonbinders. Large scale absolute binding free energy calculations that cover over 3000 protein-ligand complexes were performed using the BEDAM method starting from docked structures generated by Glide docking. Although the ligand dataset in this study resembles an intermediate to late stage lead optimization project while the BEDAM method is mainly developed for early stage virtual screening of hit molecules, the BEDAM binding free energy scoring has resulted in a moderate enrichment of ligand screening against this challenging drug target. Results show that, using a statistical mechanics based free energy method like BEDAM starting from docked poses offers better enrichment than classical docking scoring functions and rescoring methods like Prime MM-GBSA for the Hsp90 data set in this blind challenge. Importantly, among the three methods tested here, only the mean value of the BEDAM binding free energy scores is able to separate the large group of binders from the small group of nonbinders with a gap of 2.4 kcal/mol. None of the three methods that we have tested provided accurate ranking of the affinities of the 147 active compounds. We discuss the possible sources of errors in the binding free energy calculations. The study suggests that BEDAM can be used strategically to discriminate binders from nonbinders in virtual screening and to more accurately predict the ligand binding modes prior to the more computationally expensive FEP calculations of binding affinity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding free energy; D3R; Docking; GC2015; Hsp90; ROC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562018      PMCID: PMC5869689          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9952-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  22 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Accurate Binding Free Energy Predictions in Fragment Optimization.

Authors:  Thomas B Steinbrecher; Markus Dahlgren; Daniel Cappel; Teng Lin; Lingle Wang; Goran Krilov; Robert Abel; Richard Friesner; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more efficient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2).

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Richard A Friesner; B J Berne
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  The AGBNP2 Implicit Solvation Model.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Kristina Paris; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 7.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method: Hamiltonian Replica Exchange with Torsional Flattening for Binding Mode Prediction and Binding Free Energy Estimation.

Authors:  Ahmet Mentes; Nan-Jie Deng; R S K Vijayan; Junchao Xia; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06

10.  Distinguishing binders from false positives by free energy calculations: fragment screening against the flap site of HIV protease.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Stefano Forli; Peng He; Alex Perryman; Lauren Wickstrom; R S K Vijayan; Theresa Tiefenbrunn; David Stout; Emilio Gallicchio; Arthur J Olson; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  9 in total

1.  Resolving the Ligand-Binding Specificity in c-MYC G-Quadruplex DNA: Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations and SPR Experiment.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Lauren Wickstrom; Piotr Cieplak; Clement Lin; Danzhou Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Polo C-H Lam; Ruben Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Optimal affinity ranking for automated virtual screening validated in prospective D3R grand challenges.

Authors:  Bentley M Wingert; Rick Oerlemans; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Improving small molecule virtual screening strategies for the next generation of therapeutics.

Authors:  Bentley M Wingert; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Application of the alchemical transfer and potential of mean force methods to the SAMPL8 host-guest blinded challenge.

Authors:  Solmaz Azimi; Joe Z Wu; Sheenam Khuttan; Tom Kurtzman; Nanjie Deng; Emilio Gallicchio
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Effect of set up protocols on the accuracy of alchemical free energy calculation over a set of ACK1 inhibitors.

Authors:  José M Granadino-Roldán; Antonia S J S Mey; Juan J Pérez González; Stefano Bosisio; Jaime Rubio-Martinez; Julien Michel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Structure-based virtual screening workflow to identify antivirals targeting HIV-1 capsid.

Authors:  Qinfang Sun; Avik Biswas; R S K Vijayan; Pierrick Craveur; Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson; Andres Emanuelli Castaner; Karen A Kirby; Stefan G Sarafianos; Nanjie Deng; Ronald Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.179

9.  Absolute binding free energy calculations improve enrichment of actives in virtual compound screening.

Authors:  Mudong Feng; Germano Heinzelmann; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.