| Literature DB >> 25625034 |
Vladimir Chistyakov1, Vyacheslav Melnikov2, Michael L Chikindas3, Maiko Khutsishvili4, Avtandil Chagelishvili4, Angelika Bren1, Natalia Kostina1, Veronica Cavera5, Vladimir Elisashvili4.
Abstract
Birds were given a new formulation of the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 solid-state fermented soybean that retained the spores of the aforementioned organism. Mass dynamics, feed flow rate and broiler performance were observed to evaluate the efficacy of the formulation. At each time point, the live mass was greater than that of the control group, reaching a difference of 7-8% by day 28. A difference of 5.3-8.8% was observed in feed conversion per kilogram live mass (1.97 kg in the controls as compared with 1.81-1.87 kg in experimental groups). This indicates a positive effect of the B. amyloliquefaciens B-1895 formulation on the live mass of broilers as well as on feed consumption.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; probiotic; solid-state fermentation
Year: 2014 PMID: 25625034 PMCID: PMC4300313 DOI: 10.12938/bmfh.2014-012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Microbiota Food Health ISSN: 2186-3342
Poultry feed formulation
| Variable components | Age (days) | ||
| 0–11 | 11–24 | 25–slaughter | |
| Crude protein (%) | 22.8 | 21.9 | 21.2 |
| Energy (kcal/kg) | 307 | 316 | 320 |
| Lysine (%) | 1.42 | 0.82 | 0.7 |
| Methionine (%) | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.38 |
| Methionine + cystine (%) | 1.06 | 0.95 | 0.81 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.4 |
| Vitamin A (IU/kg) | 13,500 | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| Vitamin D3 (IU/kg) | 4,950 | 3,900 | 3,900 |
| Vitamin E (IU/kg) | 73 | 48 | 47 |
Major constituents remaining unchanged for the entire feeding period: yellow maize (50–55%), soy meal (28–33%), sunflower oil (2–4%), monocalcium phosphate (0.2%).
Fig. 1.Growth dynamics of broiler chickens.
Dynamics of the live weight of broiler chickens
| Group | Index | Age (days) | ||||
| 1 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | ||
| 1 | n | 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Average weight (g) | 40 | 166 | 430 | 776 | 1,317 | |
| Standard deviation | <1 | 9 | 32 | 58 | 35 | |
| 2 | n | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Average weight (g) | 40 | 171 | 472 | 819 | 1,432 | |
| Standard deviation | <1 | 10 | 40 | 53 | 42 | |
| p (t-test)* | NT | 0.21 | 0.015 | 0.096 | 0.0001 | |
| 3 | n | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Average weight (g) | 40 | 170 | 471 | 805 | 1411 | |
| Standard deviation | <1 | 8 | 21 | 55 | 34 | |
| p (t-test)* | NT | 0.81 | 0.004 | 0.26 | 0.0001 | |
* Statistical significance of differences from group 1.
Feed consumption by broiler chickens
| Index | Unit | Group | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Feed flow rate on 1 bird | kg | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.65 |
| Feed flow rate for 1 kg growth | kg | 1.97 | 1.81 | 1.87 |