Literature DB >> 18577631

Effects of a direct-fed microbial (primalac) on turkey poult performance and susceptibility to oral Salmonella challenge.

J L Grimes1, S Rahimi, E Oviedo, B W Sheldon, F B O Santos.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine 1) the effect of a dietary direct-fed microbial (DFM) on turkey poult performance, 2) the effect of a DFM on a Salmonella challenge, and 3) the effect of feed processing on the efficacy of the dietary DFM. Day-of-hatch Large White female poults were placed in 2 rooms in 2 Petersime batteries per room. Twelve pens of 7 birds each were used in each battery (24 pens per room, 336 birds total). One of 4 dietary feed treatments was assigned to each pen (6 pens per room for each diet). One room housed non-Salmonella-challenged poults, and the other room housed poults challenged with a 1-mL oral gavage of Salmonella (10(10) cfu/mL). A single batch of starter ration was split into 4 parts and used to provide 4 dietary treatments: 1) mash feed with no DFM (M), 2) mash feed with DFM (Primalac; 0.9 kg/tonne of feed, MD), 3) pelleted (20-s steam conditioning at 80 degrees C) and crumbled feed with no DFM (C), and 4) pelleted and crumbled feed with DFM (CD). Feed and deionized, distilled water were provided ad libitum. Data were collected and analyzed separately for each room. Mortality was recorded for each pen on a daily basis and totaled by week and for the 3-wk period. Individual BW and feed consumption, by pen, were measured weekly. Weekly and cumulative BW gains and feed to gain ratios (F:G) were calculated. Liver, spleen, total and lower intestinal tract weights, intestinal length, and most-probable-number Salmonella populations were determined for one randomly selected bird per pen. Feeding processed feed resulted in improved BW and F:G. Feeding the DFM improved 3-wk cumulative F:G in birds not gavaged and reduced relative intestinal weight in birds gavaged. Salmonella populations were reduced 1 log by feeding DFM. Dietary DFM improved bird performance, reduced Salmonella populations, and was not affected by feed processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18577631     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Poultry-beneficial solid-state Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 fermented soybean formulation.

Authors:  Vladimir Chistyakov; Vyacheslav Melnikov; Michael L Chikindas; Maiko Khutsishvili; Avtandil Chagelishvili; Angelika Bren; Natalia Kostina; Veronica Cavera; Vladimir Elisashvili
Journal:  Biosci Microbiota Food Health       Date:  2014-10-24

2.  Xylanase and Direct-Fed Microbials (DFM) Potential for Improvement of Live Performance, Energy Digestibility, and Reduction of Environmental Microbial Load of Broilers.

Authors:  Basheer Nusairat; Jeng-Jie Wang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-07

3.  Dietary inclusion of multispecies probiotics to reduce the severity of post-weaning diarrhea caused by Escherichia coli F18+ in pigs.

Authors:  Yawang Sun; Marcos E Duarte; Sung Woo Kim
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-03-10

Review 4.  Live Bacterial Prophylactics in Modern Poultry.

Authors:  Graham A J Redweik; Jared Jochum; Melha Mellata
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-28

5.  Effect of a direct-fed microbial and prebiotic on performance and intestinal histomorophology of turkey poults challenged with Salmonella and Campylobacter.

Authors:  Shaban Rahimi; Sophia Kathariou; Oscar Fletcher; Jesse L Grimes
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.