OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined how individuals respond to genomic risk information for common, chronic diseases. This randomized study examined differences in responses by type of genomic information (genetic test/family history) and disease condition (diabetes/heart disease), and by race/ethnicity in a medically underserved population. METHODS:1,057 English-speaking adults completed a survey containing 1 of 4 vignettes (2-by-2 randomized design). Differences in dependent variables (i.e., interest in receiving genomic assessment, discussing with doctor or family, changing health habits) by experimental condition and race/ethnicity were examined using chi-squared tests and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in dependent variables by type of genomic information or disease condition. In multivariable models, Hispanics were more interested in receiving a genomic assessment than Whites (OR = 1.93; p < .0001); respondents with marginal (OR = 1.54; p = .005) or limited (OR = 1.85; p = .009) health literacy had greater interest than those with adequate health literacy. Blacks (OR = 1.78; p = .001) and Hispanics (OR = 1.85; p = .001) had greater interest in discussing information with family than Whites. Non-Hispanic Blacks (OR = 1.45; p = .04) had greater interest in discussing genomic information with a doctor than Whites. Blacks (β = -0.41; p < .001) and Hispanics (β = -0.25; p = .033) intended to change fewer health habits than Whites; health literacy was negatively associated with number of health habits participants intended to change. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that race/ethnicity may affect responses to genomic risk information. Additional research could examine how cognitive representations of this information differ across racial/ethnic groups. Health literacy is also critical to consider in developing approaches to communicating genomic information.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined how individuals respond to genomic risk information for common, chronic diseases. This randomized study examined differences in responses by type of genomic information (genetic test/family history) and disease condition (diabetes/heart disease), and by race/ethnicity in a medically underserved population. METHODS: 1,057 English-speaking adults completed a survey containing 1 of 4 vignettes (2-by-2 randomized design). Differences in dependent variables (i.e., interest in receiving genomic assessment, discussing with doctor or family, changing health habits) by experimental condition and race/ethnicity were examined using chi-squared tests and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in dependent variables by type of genomic information or disease condition. In multivariable models, Hispanics were more interested in receiving a genomic assessment than Whites (OR = 1.93; p < .0001); respondents with marginal (OR = 1.54; p = .005) or limited (OR = 1.85; p = .009) health literacy had greater interest than those with adequate health literacy. Blacks (OR = 1.78; p = .001) and Hispanics (OR = 1.85; p = .001) had greater interest in discussing information with family than Whites. Non-Hispanic Blacks (OR = 1.45; p = .04) had greater interest in discussing genomic information with a doctor than Whites. Blacks (β = -0.41; p < .001) and Hispanics (β = -0.25; p = .033) intended to change fewer health habits than Whites; health literacy was negatively associated with number of health habits participants intended to change. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that race/ethnicity may affect responses to genomic risk information. Additional research could examine how cognitive representations of this information differ across racial/ethnic groups. Health literacy is also critical to consider in developing approaches to communicating genomic information.
Authors: Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody Journal: Public Health Genomics Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Natalia Kuhn; Lindsey Hoskins; Anne Letocha; Regina Kenen; Jennifer Loud; Mark H Greene Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride; Christopher Wade; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert Reid; Eric Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody Journal: Genet Med Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Vivian M Rodríguez; Erika Robers; Kate Zielaskowski; C Javier González; Keith Hunley; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Dolores D Guest; Andrew Sussman; Kirsten A Meyer White; Matthew R Schwartz; Jennie Greb; Yvonne Talamantes; Jessica Bigney; Marianne Berwick; Jennifer L Hay Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2016-12-06
Authors: Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Melody S Goodman; Yuyu Chen; Xiangying Chu; Richard L Bradshaw; Rachelle Lorenz Chambers; Priscilla A Chan; Brianne M Daly; Michael Flynn; Amanda Gammon; Rachel Hess; Cecelia Kessler; Wendy K Kohlmann; Devin M Mann; Rachel Monahan; Sara Peel; Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; Meenakshi Sigireddi; Saundra S Buys; Ophira Ginsburg; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-10-03
Authors: Jordan G Nestor; Amber J Li; Kristen L King; S Ali Husain; Tristan J McIntosh; Deirdre Sawinski; Ana S Iltis; Melody S Goodman; Heidi A Walsh; James M DuBois; Sumit Mohan Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 3.456
Authors: Katianne M Howard Sharp; Niki Jurbergs; Annastasia Ouma; Lynn Harrison; Elsie Gerhardt; Leslie Taylor; Kayla Hamilton; Rose B McGee; Regina Nuccio; Emily Quinn; Stacy Hines-Dowell; Chimene Kesserwan; Anusha Sunkara; Jami S Gattuso; Michelle Pritchard; Belinda Mandrell; Mary V Relling; Cyrine E Haidar; Guolian Kang; Liza M Johnson; Kim E Nichols Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2020-03-24
Authors: Erin Connors; Rebecca Selove; Juan Canedo; Maureen Sanderson; Pamela Hull; Marilyn Adams; Ila McDermott; Calvin Barlow; Denice Johns-Porter; Caree McAfee; Karen Gilliam; Oscar Miller; Nora Cox; Mary Kay Fadden; Stephen King; Hilary Tindle Journal: J Health Dispar Res Pract Date: 2019