PURPOSE: For the advances of pediatric oncology next generation sequencing (NGS) research to equitably benefit all children, a diverse and representative sample of participants is needed. However, little is known about demographic and clinical characteristics that differentiate families who decline enrollment in pediatric oncology NGS research. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively extracted for 363 pediatric oncology patients (0-21 years) approached for enrollment on Genomes for Kids (G4K), a study examining the feasibility of comprehensive clinical genomic analysis of tumors and paired normal samples. Demographic and clinical factors that significantly differentiated which families declined were subsequently compared to enrollment in Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenetics (PG4KDS) for 348 families, a pharmacogenomics study with more explicit therapeutic benefit examining genes affecting drug responses and metabolism. RESULTS: Fifty-three (14.6%) families declined enrollment in G4K. Race/ethnicity was the only variable that significantly differentiated study refusal using multivariate logistic regression, with families of black children more likely to decline enrollment compared to families of non-Hispanic or Hispanic white children. Reasons for declining G4K were generally consistent with other pediatric genomics research, with feeling overwhelmed and insurance discrimination fears most frequently cited. Families of black children were also more likely to decline enrollment in PG4KDS. Thirteen (3.7%) of the 348 families approached for both studies declined PG4KDS. CONCLUSION: Race/ethnicity differentiated study declination across two different pediatric oncology genomics studies, suggesting enrollment disparities in the context of pediatric oncology genomics research. Genomics research participant samples that do not fully represent racial and ethnic minorities risk further exacerbating health disparities. Additional work is needed to understand the nuances of parental decision making in genomic research and facilitate enrollment of diverse patient populations.
PURPOSE: For the advances of pediatric oncology next generation sequencing (NGS) research to equitably benefit all children, a diverse and representative sample of participants is needed. However, little is known about demographic and clinical characteristics that differentiate families who decline enrollment in pediatric oncology NGS research. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively extracted for 363 pediatric oncology patients (0-21 years) approached for enrollment on Genomes for Kids (G4K), a study examining the feasibility of comprehensive clinical genomic analysis of tumors and paired normal samples. Demographic and clinical factors that significantly differentiated which families declined were subsequently compared to enrollment in Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenetics (PG4KDS) for 348 families, a pharmacogenomics study with more explicit therapeutic benefit examining genes affecting drug responses and metabolism. RESULTS: Fifty-three (14.6%) families declined enrollment in G4K. Race/ethnicity was the only variable that significantly differentiated study refusal using multivariate logistic regression, with families of black children more likely to decline enrollment compared to families of non-Hispanic or Hispanic white children. Reasons for declining G4K were generally consistent with other pediatric genomics research, with feeling overwhelmed and insurance discrimination fears most frequently cited. Families of black children were also more likely to decline enrollment in PG4KDS. Thirteen (3.7%) of the 348 families approached for both studies declined PG4KDS. CONCLUSION: Race/ethnicity differentiated study declination across two different pediatric oncology genomics studies, suggesting enrollment disparities in the context of pediatric oncology genomics research. Genomics research participant samples that do not fully represent racial and ethnic minorities risk further exacerbating health disparities. Additional work is needed to understand the nuances of parental decision making in genomic research and facilitate enrollment of diverse patient populations.
Authors: Stephanie A Kraft; Mildred K Cho; Katherine Gillespie; Meghan Halley; Nina Varsava; Kelly E Ormond; Harold S Luft; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee Journal: Am J Bioeth Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 11.229
Authors: Melissa A Alderfer; Kristin Zelley; Robert B Lindell; Ana Novokmet; Phuong L Mai; Judy E Garber; Deepika Nathan; Sarah Scollon; Nicolette M Chun; Andrea F Patenaude; James M Ford; Sharon E Plon; Joshua D Schiffman; Lisa R Diller; Sharon A Savage; David Malkin; Carol A Ford; Kim E Nichols Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Claire E Wakefield; Lucy V Hanlon; Katherine M Tucker; Andrea F Patenaude; Christina Signorelli; Jordana K McLoone; Richard J Cohn Journal: Genet Med Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Rajen J Mody; Yi-Mi Wu; Robert J Lonigro; Xuhong Cao; Sameek Roychowdhury; Pankaj Vats; Kevin M Frank; John R Prensner; Irfan Asangani; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Jonathan R Dillman; Raja M Rabah; Laxmi Priya Kunju; Jessica Everett; Victoria M Raymond; Yu Ning; Fengyun Su; Rui Wang; Elena M Stoffel; Jeffrey W Innis; J Scott Roberts; Patricia L Robertson; Gregory Yanik; Aghiad Chamdin; James A Connelly; Sung Choi; Andrew C Harris; Carrie Kitko; Rama Jasty Rao; John E Levine; Valerie P Castle; Raymond J Hutchinson; Moshe Talpaz; Dan R Robinson; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Scott Newman; Joy Nakitandwe; Chimene A Kesserwan; Elizabeth M Azzato; David A Wheeler; David W Ellison; James R Downing; Jinghui Zhang; Kim E Nichols; Michael Rusch; Sheila Shurtleff; Dale J Hedges; Kayla V Hamilton; Scott G Foy; Michael N Edmonson; Andrew Thrasher; Armita Bahrami; Brent A Orr; Jeffery M Klco; Jiali Gu; Lynn W Harrison; Lu Wang; Michael R Clay; Annastasia Ouma; Antonina Silkov; Yanling Liu; Zhaojie Zhang; Yu Liu; Samuel W Brady; Xin Zhou; Ti-Cheng Chang; Manjusha Pande; Eric Davis; Jared Becksfort; Aman Patel; Mark R Wilkinson; Delaram Rahbarinia; Manish Kubal; Jamie L Maciaszek; Victor Pastor; Jay Knight; Alexander M Gout; Jian Wang; Zhaohui Gu; Charles G Mullighan; Rose B McGee; Emily A Quinn; Regina Nuccio; Roya Mostafavi; Elsie L Gerhardt; Leslie M Taylor; Jessica M Valdez; Stacy J Hines-Dowell; Alberto S Pappo; Giles Robinson; Liza-Marie Johnson; Ching-Hon Pui Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 39.397