Literature DB >> 34661305

Impact of education on APOL1 testing attitudes among prospective living kidney donors.

Jordan G Nestor1, Amber J Li1, Kristen L King1,2, S Ali Husain1,2,3, Tristan J McIntosh4, Deirdre Sawinski5, Ana S Iltis6, Melody S Goodman7, Heidi A Walsh4, James M DuBois4, Sumit Mohan1,2,3.   

Abstract

It is unknown how providing prospective living donors with information about APOL1, including the benefits and drawbacks of testing, influences their desire for testing. In this study, we surveyed 102 participants with self-reported African ancestry and positive family history of kidney disease, recruited from our nephrology waiting room. We assessed views on APOL1 testing before and after presentation of a set of potential benefits and drawbacks of testing and quantified the self-reported level of influence individual benefits and drawbacks had on participants' desire for testing in the proposed context of living donation. The majority of participants (92%) were aware of organ donation and more than half (56%) had considered living donation. And though we found no significant change in response following presentation of the potential benefits and the drawbacks of APOL1 testing by study end significance, across all participants, "becoming aware of the potential risk of kidney disease among your immediate family" was the benefit with the highest mean influence (3.3±1.4), while the drawback with the highest mean influence (2.9±1.5) was "some transplant centers may not allow you to donate to a loved one". This study provides insights into the priorities of prospective living donors and suggests concern for how the information affects family members may strongly influence desires for testing. It also highlights the need for greater community engagement to gain a deeper understanding of the priorities that influence decision making on APOL1 testing.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APOL1; genetic testing; kidney transplant; living donor; patient preferences; shared decision-making

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34661305      PMCID: PMC9113661          DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   3.456


  46 in total

1.  You Are Just Now Telling Us About This? African American Perspectives of Testing for Genetic Susceptibility to Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Ebele M Umeukeje; Bessie A Young; Stephanie M Fullerton; Kerri Cavanaugh; Delia Owens; James G Wilson; Wylie Burke; Erika Blacksher
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Engaging diverse populations in biospecimen donation: results from the Hoy y Mañana study.

Authors:  Elisa M Rodriguez; Frances G Saad-Harfouche; Austin Miller; Martin C Mahoney; Christine B Ambrosone; Carl D Morrison; Willie Underwood; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-08-03

3.  Racial disparities in living kidney donation: is there a lack of willing donors or an excess of medically unsuitable candidates?

Authors:  Shayna L Lunsford; Kit S Simpson; Kenneth D Chavin; Kerry J Menching; Lucia G Miles; Lilless M Shilling; Gilbert R Smalls; Prabhakar K Baliga
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  APOL1 Genetic Testing in Living Kidney Transplant Donors.

Authors:  Sumit Mohan; Ana S Iltis; Deirdre Sawinski; James M DuBois
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Lina Jandorf; William Redd
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-11

7.  What Black Women Know and Want to Know About Counseling and Testing for BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Inez Adams; Juleen Christopher; Karen Patricia Williams; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Health beliefs among African American women regarding genetic testing and counseling for sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Shanna L Gustafson; Elizabeth A Gettig; Margaret Watt-Morse; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Variation of ApoL1 Testing Practices for Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Tristan McIntosh; Sumit Mohan; Deirdre Sawinski; Ana Iltis; James M DuBois
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.187

10.  Opinions of African American adults about the use of apolipoprotein L1 (ApoL1) genetic testing in living kidney donation and transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret Berrigan; Jasmine Austrie; Aaron Fleishman; Kenneth P Tercyak; Martin R Pollak; Martha Pavlakis; Vinayak Rohan; Prabhakar K Baliga; Liise K Kayler; Thomas H Feeley; James R Rodrigue
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Practical Guide to Genetic Testing for Kidney Disorders of Unknown Etiology.

Authors:  Abraham W Aron; Neera K Dahl; Whitney Besse
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-07-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.