Literature DB >> 18981357

Parents' concern about their own and their children's genetic disease risk: potential effects of family history vs genetic test results.

Beth A Tarini1, Dianne Singer, Sarah J Clark, Matthew M Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the genetic risk information source (family history vs genetic test results) on parents' concern about their own and their children's genetic disease risk.
DESIGN: Randomized trial using a Web-enabled survey.
SETTING: Internet survey. PARTICIPANTS: National sample of 1,342 parents. Intervention Parents first received a vignette about their hypothetical genetic risk, randomized as either a family history assessment or genetic test results. Next, parents received a vignette about their youngest child's hypothetical genetic risk, similarly randomized. Main Outcome Measure Parents' concern about their own and their child's genetic disease risk.
RESULTS: The response rate was 71.2%. Parents were more likely to be concerned about their own disease risk when the risk estimate came from a family history assessment vs a genetic test result (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.68). In contrast, information source was not associated with parents' concern about their children's disease risk. Parents' level of concern about disease risk was identical for themselves and their children 73% of the time in the same scenario. When concern differed, parents almost always reported greater concern about disease risk for their children.
CONCLUSIONS: Positive family history of disease generated greater concern about parents' own risk of inherited disease than did genetic test results. This effect was not evident for parents' concern about their children's risk. As genetic tests emerge and become increasingly available, physicians must not overlook the effect of family history on an individual's concern about disease risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18981357     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.162.11.1079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  11 in total

1.  Research participation by low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups: how payment may change the balance.

Authors:  Jennifer K Walter; James F Burke; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Jeff Niederdeppe; Colleen L Barry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Effects of racial and ethnic group and health literacy on responses to genomic risk information in a medically underserved population.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Jewel D Stafford; Lucy D'Agostino McGowan; Joann Seo; Christina R Lachance; Melody S Goodman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Review and Comparison of Electronic Patient-Facing Family Health History Tools.

Authors:  Brandon M Welch; Kevin Wiley; Lance Pflieger; Rosaline Achiangia; Karen Baker; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Heath Morrison; Joshua Schiffman; Megan Doerr
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Parents' interest in genetic testing of their offspring in multiplex epilepsy families.

Authors:  Courtney B Caminiti; Dale C Hesdorffer; Sara Shostak; Jeff Goldsmith; Shawn T Sorge; Melodie R Winawer; Jo C Phelan; Wendy K Chung; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.864

6.  Later School Start Times: What Informs Parent Support or Opposition?

Authors:  Galit Levi Dunietz; Amilcar Matos-Moreno; Dianne C Singer; Matthew M Davis; Louise M O'Brien; Ronald D Chervin
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  A tailored approach to family-centered genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis newborn screening: the Wisconsin model.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Christina Zaleski; Dania Stachiw-Hietpas; Peggy Modaff; Craig R Adamski; Megan R Nelson; Catherine A Reiser; Sumedha Ghate; Kevin D Josephson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A randomized trial of the clinical utility of genetic testing for obesity: design and implementation considerations.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Erynn S Gordon; Catharine B Stack; Ching-Ti Liu; Tricia Norkunas; Lisa Wawak; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel S Dodson; Aaron J Goldenberg; Matthew M Davis; Dianne C Singer; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.