PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of automatic tube potential selection and automatic exposure control combined with female breast displacement during coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on radiation exposure in women versus men of the same body size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive clinical exams between January 2012 and July 2013 at an academic medical center were retrospectively analyzed. All examinations were performed using ECG-gating, automated tube potential, and tube current selection algorithm (APS-AEC) with breast displacement in females. Cohorts were stratified by sex and standard World Health Organization body mass index (BMI) ranges. CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) median effective dose (ED), and size specific dose estimate (SSDE) were recorded. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of gender on radiation exposure per BMI. RESULTS: A total of 726 exams were included, 343 (47%) were females; mean BMI was similar by gender (28.6±6.9 kg/m(2) females vs. 29.2±6.3 kg/m(2) males; P=0.168). Median ED was 2.3 mSv (1.4-5.2) for females and 3.6 (2.5-5.9) for males (P<0.001). Females were exposed to less radiation by a difference in median ED of -1.3 mSv, CTDIvol -4.1 mGy, and SSDE -6.8 mGy (all P<0.001). After adjusting for BMI, patient characteristics, and gating mode, females exposure was lower by a median ED of -0.7 mSv, CTDIvol -2.3 mGy, and SSDE -3.15 mGy, respectively (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a difference in radiation exposure to patients undergoing CCTA with the combined use of AEC-APS and breast displacement in female patients as compared to their BMI-matched male counterparts, with female patients receiving one third less exposure.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of automatic tube potential selection and automatic exposure control combined with female breast displacement during coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on radiation exposure in women versus men of the same body size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive clinical exams between January 2012 and July 2013 at an academic medical center were retrospectively analyzed. All examinations were performed using ECG-gating, automated tube potential, and tube current selection algorithm (APS-AEC) with breast displacement in females. Cohorts were stratified by sex and standard World Health Organization body mass index (BMI) ranges. CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) median effective dose (ED), and size specific dose estimate (SSDE) were recorded. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of gender on radiation exposure per BMI. RESULTS: A total of 726 exams were included, 343 (47%) were females; mean BMI was similar by gender (28.6±6.9 kg/m(2) females vs. 29.2±6.3 kg/m(2) males; P=0.168). Median ED was 2.3 mSv (1.4-5.2) for females and 3.6 (2.5-5.9) for males (P<0.001). Females were exposed to less radiation by a difference in median ED of -1.3 mSv, CTDIvol -4.1 mGy, and SSDE -6.8 mGy (all P<0.001). After adjusting for BMI, patient characteristics, and gating mode, females exposure was lower by a median ED of -0.7 mSv, CTDIvol -2.3 mGy, and SSDE -3.15 mGy, respectively (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a difference in radiation exposure to patients undergoing CCTA with the combined use of AEC-APS and breast displacement in female patients as compared to their BMI-matched male counterparts, with female patients receiving one third less exposure.
Authors: Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja S Meyer; Eugenio Martuscelli; Pietro Spagnolo; Hiroaki Yamamoto; Patricia Carrascosa; Thomas Anger; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Hatem Alkadhi; Stefan Martinoff; Martin Hadamitzky; Franziska Hein; Bernhard Bischoff; Miriam Kuse; Albert Schömig; Stephan Achenbach Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-05
Authors: Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Judith A Boura; Ann DePetris; Ralph Gentry; Aiden Abidov; David A Share; Gilbert L Raff Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Ashley M Lee; Jonathan Beaudoin; Leif-Christopher Engel; Manavjot S Sidhu; Suhny Abbara; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann; Brian B Ghoshhajra Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-03-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Márcio Sommer Bittencourt; Bernhard Schmidt; Martin Seltmann; Gerd Muschiol; Dieter Ropers; Werner Günther Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Shane J Foley; Mark F McEntee; Stephan Achenbach; Patrick C Brennan; Louise S Rainford; Jonathan D Dodd Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Nandini M Meyersohn; Balint Szilveszter; Pedro V Staziaki; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Richard A P Takx; Udo Hoffmann; Brian B Ghoshhajra Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2017-03-22
Authors: Michael K Cheezum; Christophe E Redon; Allison S Burrell; Anthony S Kaviratne; Jody Bindeman; Daisuke Maeda; Houria Balmakhtar; Ashly Pezel; Piotr Wisniewski; Panfilo Delacruz; Binh Nguyen; William M Bonner; Todd C Villines Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Brian B Ghoshhajra; Richard A P Takx; Pedro V Staziaki; Harshna Vadvala; Phillip Kim; Tomas G Neilan; Nandini M Meyersohn; Daniel Bittner; Sumbal A Janjua; Thomas Mayrhofer; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Quyhn A Truong; Suhny Abbara; David F M Brown; James L Januzzi; Sanjeev Francis; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 5.315