Literature DB >> 21785082

Breast surface radiation dose during coronary CT angiography: reduction by breast displacement and lead shielding.

Shane J Foley1, Mark F McEntee, Stephan Achenbach, Patrick C Brennan, Louise S Rainford, Jonathan D Dodd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of cranial breast displacement and lead shielding on in vivo breast surface radiation dose in women undergoing coronary CT angiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four women (mean age, 59.2 ± 9.8 years) prospectively underwent coronary 64-MDCT angiography for evaluation of chest pain. The patients were randomly assigned to a control group (n = 16), breast displacement group (n = 22), or breast displacement plus lead shielding group (n = 16). Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed superficially on each breast quadrant and the areolar region of both breasts. Breast surface radiation doses, the degree of breast displacement, and coronary image quality were compared between groups. A phantom dose study was conducted to compare breast doses with z-axis positioning on the chest wall.
RESULTS: A total of 1620 TLD dose measurements were recorded. Compared with control values, the mean breast surface dose was reduced 23% in the breast displacement group (24.3 vs 18.6 mGy, p = 0.015) and 36% in the displacement plus lead shielding group (24.3 vs 15.6 mGy, p = 0.0001). Surface dose reductions were greatest in the upper outer (displacement alone, 66%; displacement plus shielding, 63%), upper inner (65%, 58%), and areolar quadrants (44%, 53%). The smallest surface dose reductions were recorded for A-cup breasts: 7% for the displacement group and 3% for the displacement plus lead group (p = 0.741). Larger reductions in surface dose were recorded for B-cup (25% and 56%, p = 0.273), C-cup (38% and 60%, p = 0.001), and D-cup (31% and 25%, p = 0.095) sizes. Most of the patients (79%) had either good (< 50% of breast above scan range) or excellent (< 75% of breast above the scan range) breast displacement. No significant difference in coronary image quality was detected between groups. The phantom dose study showed that surface TLD measurements were underestimates of absorbed tissue dose by a mean of 9% and that a strong negative correlation exists between the amount of cranial displacement and breast dose.
CONCLUSION: Use of breast displacement during coronary CTA substantially reduces the radiation dose to the breast surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21785082     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.10.4569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Breast Shielding during Heart Imaging on DNA Double-Strand-Break Levels: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michael K Cheezum; Christophe E Redon; Allison S Burrell; Anthony S Kaviratne; Jody Bindeman; Daisuke Maeda; Houria Balmakhtar; Ashly Pezel; Piotr Wisniewski; Panfilo Delacruz; Binh Nguyen; William M Bonner; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  In vivo radiation dosimetry and image quality of turbo-flash and retrospective dual-source CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nicolò Schicchi; Alberto Mari; Marco Fogante; Paolo Esposto Pirani; Giacomo Agliata; Niccolò Tosi; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Ester Cannizzaro; Federico Bruno; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Stefania Maggi; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Coronary CTA using scout-based automated tube potential and current selection algorithm, with breast displacement results in lower radiation exposure in females compared to males.

Authors:  Harshna Vadvala; Phillip Kim; Thomas Mayrhofer; Oleg Pianykh; Mannudeep Kalra; Udo Hoffmann; Brian Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

4.  Visual grading characteristics and ordinal regression analysis during optimisation of CT head examinations.

Authors:  Francis Zarb; Mark F McEntee; Louise Rainford
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-12-16

5.  A study to assess the knowledge and practice of medical professionals on radiation protection in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Mohsen Shafiee; Razieh Rashidfar; Jamil Abdolmohammadi; Sajad Borzoueisileh; Zaker Salehi; Kheibar Dashtian
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2020-03-30

Review 6.  Non-invasive Imaging in Women With Heart Failure - Diagnosis and Insights Into Disease Mechanisms.

Authors:  Rebecca Kozor; Aderonke Abiodun; Katharine Kott; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-05-04

7.  The effect of breast shielding during lumbar spine radiography.

Authors:  Nejc Mekis; Dejan Zontar; Damijan Skrk
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.